Suppr超能文献

巴德CT引导系统的临床试验。

Clinical trial of the Bard CT guide system.

作者信息

Brown K T, Getrajdman G I, Botet J F

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1995 May-Jun;6(3):405-10. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(95)72831-7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Bard computed tomography (CT) guide holds a Monopty gun within the CT gantry and mechanically aids insertion of the needle tip. The clinical efficacy and accuracy of this device, its effect on procedure time, and the limitations of the device were studied.

PATIENT AND METHODS

In a prospective study, the outcome of 107 consecutive biopsies performed with 18-gauge needles was evaluated. In every patient, an attempt was made to perform the biopsy with an 18-gauge Monopty gun positioned with the Bard CT guide and with a hand-held 18-gauge PercuCut needle. Of 107 patients, 73 underwent biopsy with both devices, and 34 underwent biopsy with the PercuCut needle alone.

RESULTS

The device could not be used in 32% of patients, primarily due to patient size or the need to use a lateral approach to a lesion. When the device was used, it positioned the needle within +/- 2 degrees of the programmed angle and at the programmed depth in 96% of cases on the first attempt; the target lesion was hit in 93% of cases (vs 78% with the hand-held needle). Use of the device resulted in a diagnostic biopsy in 84% of cases versus 93% with percuCut needle. This difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Despite certain limitations, the Bard CT guide is extremely accurate. Its use decreases the number of times a needle must be repositioned prior to biopsy, thus it would likely reduce the overall procedure time. The diagnostic accuracy of 84% is good and could be improved on by immediately evaluating the specimen cytologically and making additional passes where necessary.

摘要

目的

巴德计算机断层扫描(CT)导向器可在CT机架内固定单切割针,并在机械上辅助针尖的插入。本研究探讨了该设备的临床疗效和准确性、其对操作时间的影响以及该设备的局限性。

患者与方法

在一项前瞻性研究中,评估了连续107例使用18号针进行活检的结果。对每位患者,均尝试使用置于巴德CT导向器中的18号单切割针和手持18号PercuCut针进行活检。107例患者中,73例使用两种设备进行活检,34例仅使用PercuCut针进行活检。

结果

32%的患者无法使用该设备,主要原因是患者体型或需要采用侧入路穿刺病变。当使用该设备时,在首次尝试时,96%的情况下针的定位角度在设定角度的±2度范围内且深度符合设定要求;93%的病例命中目标病变(手持针为78%)。使用该设备的病例中84%获得诊断性活检,而使用PercuCut针为93%。这一差异无统计学意义。

结论

尽管存在一定局限性,但巴德CT导向器极其准确。其使用减少了活检前针必须重新定位的次数,因此可能会缩短整体操作时间。84%的诊断准确率良好,通过立即对标本进行细胞学评估并在必要时进行额外穿刺可进一步提高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验