Weidner M D, Gavigan K E, Tyndall G L, Hickey M S, McCammon M R, Houmard J A
Human Performance Laboratory, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, USA.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995 May;19(5):325-30.
To determine which anthropometric methods of assessing body fat distribution are the most predictive of the insulin resistance of aging.
Commonly used indices of regional adiposity were correlated with whole-body insulin sensitivity in 55 men and 29 women (age range 18-80 years).
Insulin sensitivity (SI, minimal model), waist and hip girths, waist-to-hip ratios, conicity index, skinfolds, body fat percentage, maximal oxygen consumption.
There was a wide disparity in the strength of relationships between commonly used anthropometric indices of fat distribution and whole-body insulin sensitivity. In both sexes minimal waist girth, however, was the primary variable in multivariate regression analysis, accounting for approximately 37% of the variance in SI.
These findings indicate that anthropometric measures of regional adiposity are not interchangeable and/or equivalent when attempting to discern relationships between body fat distribution, insulin sensitivity, and aging.
确定评估体脂分布的哪些人体测量方法对衰老的胰岛素抵抗最具预测性。
将常用的局部肥胖指数与55名男性和29名女性(年龄范围18 - 80岁)的全身胰岛素敏感性进行相关性分析。
胰岛素敏感性(SI,最小模型法)、腰围和臀围、腰臀比、锥度指数、皮褶厚度、体脂百分比、最大耗氧量。
常用的体脂分布人体测量指数与全身胰岛素敏感性之间的关系强度存在很大差异。然而,在多变量回归分析中,最小腰围是主要变量,约占SI方差的37%。
这些发现表明,在试图辨别体脂分布、胰岛素敏感性和衰老之间的关系时,局部肥胖的人体测量指标并非可互换和/或等效的。