Houmard J A, McCulley C, Roy L K, Bruner R K, McCammon M R, Israel R G
Human Performance Laboratory, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1994 Apr;18(4):243-8.
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether absolute and relative measurements of regional adiposity differ in their responses to exercise intervention and which measures are most predictive of changes in plasma lipids, insulin sensitivity and adiposity. Thirteen middle-aged men (BMI 30.4 +/- 1.5 kg/m2, age 47.2 +/- 1.5 years, mean +/- s.e.) were examined before and after 14 weeks of endurance-oriented physical activity (3-4 days/week, 30-45 min/day). Significant (P < 0.05) decreases in the absolute measures of chest, waist and hip girths and sagittal diameter were evident. The waist-to-hip ratios (WHR) of umbilicus/maximal hip and minimal waist/maximal hip decreased significantly (P < 0.05). However, the WHRs of umbilicus/anterior superior iliac spine and umbilicus/greater trochanters did not change due to parallel decreases in waist and hip girths. Trunk and extremity skinfolds decreased significantly (P < 0.05); however, trunk/extremity skinfold ratios were virtually unaltered. The training programme significantly (P < 0.05) increased insulin sensitivity (60%) and HDL (8%), and reduced triglyceride (25%) and total cholesterol/HDL (8%). Changes in these variables were related to changes in sagittal diameter and waist girth. These data indicate different responses to physical activity between measurements of regional adiposity, and emphasize the need for considering absolute central girths such as waist circumference and sagittal diameter when assessing fat topography and cardiovascular risk.
本研究的目的是确定局部肥胖的绝对和相对测量指标对运动干预的反应是否不同,以及哪些指标最能预测血浆脂质、胰岛素敏感性和肥胖程度的变化。13名中年男性(体重指数30.4±1.5kg/m²,年龄47.2±1.5岁,平均值±标准误)在进行为期14周的耐力型体育活动(每周3 - 4天,每天30 - 45分钟)前后接受了检查。胸部、腰围、臀围和矢状径的绝对测量值显著降低(P<0.05)。脐部/最大臀围和最小腰围/最大臀围的腰臀比显著降低(P<0.05)。然而,由于腰围和臀围平行下降,脐部/前上棘和脐部/大转子的腰臀比没有变化。躯干和四肢皮褶厚度显著降低(P<0.05);然而,躯干/四肢皮褶厚度比几乎没有改变。训练计划显著提高了胰岛素敏感性(60%)和高密度脂蛋白(8%),并降低了甘油三酯(25%)和总胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白(8%)。这些变量的变化与矢状径和腰围的变化有关。这些数据表明局部肥胖测量指标对体育活动的反应不同,并强调在评估脂肪分布和心血管风险时需要考虑腰围和矢状径等绝对中心围度。