Banderali G, Riva E, Fiocchi A, Cordaro C I, Giovannini M
Fifth Department of Paediatrics, University of Milan, Medical School, Italy.
J Int Med Res. 1995 May-Jun;23(3):175-83. doi: 10.1177/030006059502300304.
The antitussive efficacy and tolerability of dropropizine and of its enantiomer levodropropizine were evaluated in children with non-productive cough; 258 were evaluable for tolerability and 254 for efficacy. Patients randomly received either 1 mg/kg dropropizine or 2 mg/kg levodropropizine orally, three times daily for 3 days. There were statistically significant decreases in the frequency of coughing spells and nocturnal awakenings after both levodropropizine and dropropizine treatments (P < 0.001). Gastro-intestinal symptoms were mild in the two groups; somnolence was twice as frequent in the dropropizine group (10.3% vs 5.3%) and the difference is clinically relevant, though not statistically significant. Levodropropizine is as effective as an antitussive as dropropizine, but appears to carry a lower risk of daytime somnolence.
在干咳儿童中评估了右丙氧芬及其对映体左丙氧芬的镇咳疗效和耐受性;258例可评估耐受性,254例可评估疗效。患者随机口服1mg/kg右丙氧芬或2mg/kg左丙氧芬,每日3次,共3天。左丙氧芬和右丙氧芬治疗后,咳嗽发作频率和夜间觉醒次数均有统计学显著下降(P<0.001)。两组胃肠道症状均较轻;右丙氧芬组嗜睡发生率是左丙氧芬组的两倍(10.3%对5.3%),尽管差异无统计学意义,但在临床上具有相关性。左丙氧芬作为镇咳药与右丙氧芬同样有效,但白天嗜睡风险似乎较低。