• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人际距离、身体朝向与触碰:文化、性别及年龄的影响

Interpersonal distance, body orientation, and touch: effects of culture, gender, and age.

作者信息

Remland M S, Jones T S, Brinkman H

机构信息

Department of Communication Studies, West Chester University, PA 19383, USA.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 1995 Jun;135(3):281-97. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1995.9713958.

DOI:10.1080/00224545.1995.9713958
PMID:7650932
Abstract

Video recordings of naturally occurring interactions in England, France, the Netherlands, Italy, Greece, Scotland, and Ireland were coded and analyzed to examine the effects of culture, gender, and age on interpersonal distance, body orientation, and touch. Results partially supported expected differences between contact cultures of southern Europe and noncontact cultures of northern Europe with respect to touch. More touch was observed among Italian and Greek dyads than among English, French, and Dutch dyads. In addition, an interaction effect between age and gender for body orientation suggested opposite development trends for mixed-sex dyads and male dyads. Whereas mixed dyads tended to maintain less direct orientations as they aged, male dyads maintained more direct orientations.

摘要

对英格兰、法国、荷兰、意大利、希腊、苏格兰和爱尔兰自然发生的互动视频记录进行编码和分析,以研究文化、性别和年龄对人际距离、身体朝向和触碰的影响。结果部分支持了关于触碰方面,南欧接触文化与北欧非接触文化之间预期差异的观点。观察到意大利和希腊的二人组比英国、法国和荷兰的二人组有更多的触碰。此外,身体朝向方面年龄与性别的交互作用表明,异性二人组和男性二人组呈现相反的发展趋势。随着年龄增长,异性二人组往往保持较少的直接朝向,而男性二人组则保持更多的直接朝向。

相似文献

1
Interpersonal distance, body orientation, and touch: effects of culture, gender, and age.人际距离、身体朝向与触碰:文化、性别及年龄的影响
J Soc Psychol. 1995 Jun;135(3):281-97. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1995.9713958.
2
Age, relationship, and touch initiation.
J Soc Psychol. 1998 Feb;138(1):115-23. doi: 10.1080/00224549809600359.
3
Gender and culture differences in touching behavior.触摸行为中的性别与文化差异。
J Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;144(1):49-62. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.144.1.49-62.
4
Men and women holding hands: II. Whose hand is uppermost?男女牵手:II. 哪只手在上方?
Percept Mot Skills. 1999 Oct;89(2):537-49. doi: 10.2466/pms.1999.89.2.537.
5
Measurement of the sensory qualities in tactile interaction.触觉交互中感官品质的测量。
Nurs Res. 1992 Mar-Apr;41(2):82-6.
6
Guidelines and training initiatives that support communication in cross-cultural primary-care settings: appraising their implementability using Normalization Process Theory.支持跨文化初级保健环境中沟通的指南和培训举措:运用常态化过程理论评估其可实施性。
Fam Pract. 2015 Aug;32(4):420-5. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv022. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
7
Effects of sex and sex roles on avoidance of same- and opposite-sex touch.性别及性别角色对避免与同性和异性接触的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Aug;79(1 Pt 1):107-112. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.107.
8
The effect of waitresses' touch on alcohol consumption in dyads.女服务员的触碰对两人饮酒量的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 1999 Jun;139(3):261-7. doi: 10.1080/00224549909598383.
9
Comparing the importance of different aspects of quality of life to older adults across diverse cultures.比较不同文化背景下老年人生活质量不同方面的重要性。
Age Ageing. 2011 Mar;40(2):192-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq156. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
10
The science of interpersonal touch: an overview.人际触摸的科学:概述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Feb;34(2):246-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Regulation of interpersonal distance in virtual reality: Implications for socio-emotional functioning in late adulthood.虚拟现实中人际距离的调节:对成年晚期社会情感功能的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 May 8;20(5):e0323182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323182. eCollection 2025.
2
Perceived Interpersonal Distances: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Taiwanese and Young Southeast Asians during the COVID-19 Pandemic.感知到的人际距离:新冠疫情期间台湾年轻人与东南亚年轻人的跨文化分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Dec 27;14(1):20. doi: 10.3390/bs14010020.
3
Recommended distances for physical distancing during COVID-19 pandemics reveal cultural connections between countries.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,推荐的身体距离揭示了国家之间的文化联系。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 15;18(12):e0289998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289998. eCollection 2023.
4
Touching a Mechanical Body: The Role of Anthropomorphic Framing in Physiological Arousal When Touching a Robot.触摸机械身体:触摸机器人时拟人化框架对生理唤醒的作用。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 27;23(13):5954. doi: 10.3390/s23135954.
5
Hedonic and autonomic responses in promoting affective touch.促进情感触摸的快感和自主反应。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 11;13(1):11201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37471-9.
6
Effects of Target Variables on Interpersonal Distance Perception for Young Taiwanese during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间目标变量对台湾年轻人人际距离感知的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 11;11(12):1711. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121711.
7
Love and affectionate touch toward romantic partners all over the world.世界各地的恋人间充满了爱与亲昵的触碰。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 4;13(1):5497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31502-1.
8
Sensor Fusion for Social Navigation on a Mobile Robot Based on Fast Marching Square and Gaussian Mixture Model.基于快速行进方和高斯混合模型的移动机器人社交导航传感器融合。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 11;22(22):8728. doi: 10.3390/s22228728.
9
The Swedish gamble: trust in the government and self-efficacy in the battle to combat COVID-19.瑞典的赌博:对抗新冠疫情斗争中的政府信任与自我效能感
Curr Psychol. 2022 Mar 19:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-02947-w.
10
Language and the cultural markers of COVID-19.语言与新冠疫情的文化标志。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;301:114886. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114886. Epub 2022 Mar 15.