• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

触摸行为中的性别与文化差异。

Gender and culture differences in touching behavior.

作者信息

DiBiase Rosemarie, Gunnoe Jaime

机构信息

Education and Human Services Department, Suffolk University, Boston, MA 02114-4280, USA.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;144(1):49-62. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.144.1.49-62.

DOI:10.3200/SOCP.144.1.49-62
PMID:14760964
Abstract

The authors used gender and culture to examine the theory that touching behavior is an expression of dominance. Participants were 120 men and women from Italy, the Czech Republic, and the United States. The authors examined both hand touches and nonhand touches. For hand touches, there was a significant gender-by-culture interaction in that Czech men as a group touched more than any of the other groups. For nonhand touches, Czech and Italian women and Italian men as groups touched significantly more than any of the other groups. Taken in cultural context, these results seem to support the dominance theory for touches with the hand but not for nonhand touches. The authors discussed implications and future directions.

摘要

作者利用性别和文化来检验触碰行为是支配欲表现这一理论。参与者是来自意大利、捷克共和国和美国的120名男性和女性。作者考察了手部触碰和非手部触碰。对于手部触碰,存在显著的性别与文化交互作用,即捷克男性作为一个群体的触碰比其他任何群体都多。对于非手部触碰,捷克和意大利女性以及意大利男性作为群体的触碰比其他任何群体都显著更多。结合文化背景来看,这些结果似乎支持了手部触碰的支配理论,但不支持非手部触碰的支配理论。作者讨论了研究的意义和未来方向。

相似文献

1
Gender and culture differences in touching behavior.触摸行为中的性别与文化差异。
J Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;144(1):49-62. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.144.1.49-62.
2
Cross-national variation in the size of sex differences in values: effects of gender equality.价值观中性别差异大小的跨国变化:性别平等的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):171-85. doi: 10.1037/a0015546.
3
Predictors of sexual coercion against women and men: a multilevel, multinational study of university students.针对女性和男性的性胁迫预测因素:一项针对大学生的多层次、跨国研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Jun;36(3):403-22. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9141-4.
4
Touching behaviors of winners and losers in swimming races.游泳比赛中获胜者和失败者的触摸行为。
Percept Mot Skills. 1985 Feb;60(1):289-90. doi: 10.2466/pms.1985.60.1.289.
5
Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals.社会比较、自我刻板印象以及自我建构中的性别差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Feb;90(2):221-42. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.221.
6
Eroticizing inequality in the United States: the consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships.美国的性别不平等现象:亲密关系中传统性别角色的坚持所带来的后果和决定因素。
J Sex Res. 2012;49(2-3):168-83. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.653699.
7
Social dominance and forceful submission fantasies: feminine pathology or power?社会支配和强制性屈服幻想:女性病理学还是权力?
J Sex Res. 2009 Nov-Dec;46(6):568-85. doi: 10.1080/00224490902878985.
8
The impact of the motherhood myth on women. An approach to nursing care.母性神话对女性的影响。一种护理方法。
Curr Pract Pediatr Nurs. 1980;3:51-66.
9
Gender-related stress among Japanese working women.日本职业女性的性别相关压力。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;45(3):470-88. doi: 10.1177/1363461508094677.
10
Power in stereotypically masculine domains: a Social Influence Strategy X Stereotype Match model.刻板男性化领域中的权力:一种社会影响策略X刻板印象匹配模型
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Dec;85(6):1062-78. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1062.

引用本文的文献

1
From contact to connection: a comprehensive examination of affective touch in educational settings.从接触到联结:对教育环境中情感触摸的全面审视。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 24;15:1230796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1230796. eCollection 2024.
2
Virtually simulated interpersonal touch negatively affects perceived closeness and social affiliation to an avatar partner.虚拟现实模拟的人际触摸会降低对虚拟化身伙伴的亲近感和社交归属感。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 16;14(1):1347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51773-6.
3
Topography and relationship-specific social touching in individuals displaying body image disturbances.
具有身体意象障碍者的地形学和关系特定性社会触碰。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 14;13(1):13198. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39484-w.
4
Assessing individual differences in attitudes towards touch in treatment settings: Introducing the touch & health scale.评估治疗环境中对触摸态度的个体差异:引入触摸与健康量表。
Health Psychol Open. 2022 Nov 14;9(2):20551029221137008. doi: 10.1177/20551029221137008. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
5
Changes in Touch Avoidance, Stress, and Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.意大利新冠疫情期间触觉回避、压力和焦虑的变化
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:854110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.854110. eCollection 2022.
6
Perceived Partner Responsiveness Forecasts Behavioral Intimacy as Measured by Affectionate Touch.伴侣的感知响应能力可预测通过深情触摸测量的行为亲密度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Feb;48(2):203-221. doi: 10.1177/0146167221993349. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
7
Italian Validation of the Touch Avoidance Measure and the Touch Avoidance Questionnaire.触摸回避测量及触摸回避问卷的意大利语验证
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 23;11:1673. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01673. eCollection 2020.
8
Cross-cultural similarity in relationship-specific social touching.跨文化的特定关系社会触碰的相似性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Apr 24;286(1901):20190467. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0467.
9
Social Contact Enhances Bodily Self-Awareness.社会接触增强身体自我意识。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 8;8(1):4195. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22497-1.
10
Parent-Child Positive Touch: Gender, Age, and Task Differences.亲子正向接触:性别、年龄及任务差异
J Nonverbal Behav. 2016;40(4):317-333. doi: 10.1007/s10919-016-0236-x. Epub 2016 Jul 7.