Coercion in the community: issues for mature treatment systems.
作者信息
Diamond R J
机构信息
University of Wisconsin, USA.
出版信息
New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1995 Summer(66):3-18. doi: 10.1002/yd.23319950203.
PMID:7651301
Abstract
Coercion in community-based mental health treatment refers to much more than just court-ordered treatment. Mature systems can address these issues and adopt clinical approaches that decreased the need for coercion.
摘要
相似文献
1
Coercion in the community: issues for mature treatment systems.
New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1995 Summer(66):3-18. doi: 10.1002/yd.23319950203.
2
Commentary: the search for a formula to relate competence, coercion, and mandated treatment.评论：探寻一种将能力、强制手段与强制治疗联系起来的公式。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2002;30(2):218-20.
3
Institutional options in management of coercion in anorexia treatment: the antipodean experiment?厌食症治疗中强制管理的机构选择：澳大拉西亚实验？
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2003 Nov-Dec;26(6):647-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2003.09.003.
4
[Compulsory treatment under guardianship legislation].[监护立法下的强制治疗]
Psychiatr Prax. 2006 May;33(4):196-201. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-941626.
5
[Mentally ill patient refuses treatment. How much coercion is allowed? (interview by Dr. Christine Starostzik)].[精神病患者拒绝治疗。允许使用多大程度的强制手段？（克里斯汀·斯塔罗斯齐克博士访谈）]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2013 Mar 7;155(4):6-7. doi: 10.1007/s15006-013-0197-5.
6
[Thiel A, Röttgers H.R. Compulsory treatment under guardianship legislation. Psychiat Prax 2006; 33: 196-201].[蒂尔 A，罗特格斯 H.R. 监护立法下的强制治疗。《精神病学实践》2006 年；33: 196 - 201]
Psychiatr Prax. 2006 Sep;33(6):305-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-951403.
7
Consent and the mentally disordered detained patient.同意与被拘留的精神障碍患者。
Br J Nurs. 2003;12(22):1331-4. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2003.12.22.11896.
8
Mental illness and human rights.精神疾病与人权。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;21(5):479-84. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e328305e47e.
9
PLC or TLC: is outpatient commitment the/an answer?强化个案管理或治疗性个案管理：门诊强制治疗是解决之道吗？
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):451-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.08.001. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
10
The US Supreme Court looks at voluntariness and consent.美国最高法院关注自愿性和同意性。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1994 Summer;17(3):239-52. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(94)90028-0.
引用本文的文献
1
Healthcare professionals' dilemmas: judging patient's decision making competence in day-to-day care of patients suffering from Korsakoff's syndrome.医疗保健专业人员的困境：在日常护理患有科尔萨科夫综合征的患者时判断患者的决策能力。
Med Health Care Philos. 2014 Nov;17(4):633-40. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9564-y.
Zotero 插件