Suppr超能文献

微扫视是否导致了间隙效应?

Are microsaccades responsible for the gap effect?

作者信息

Kingstone A, Fendrich R, Wessinger C M, Reuter-Lorenz P A

机构信息

University of Alberta, Department of Psychology, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 1995 Aug;57(6):796-801. doi: 10.3758/bf03206795.

Abstract

Extinguishing a fixation point shortly before, or concurrently with, the onset of a peripheral visual target reduces the latency of saccades to that target. Saslow (1967) hypothesized that this gap effect might occur because fixation point offsets reduce the incidence of corrective microsaccades with an associated saccadic refractory period. In the present study, a robust gap effect was obtained. However, using a Purkinje image eyetracker with 1 arcmin of resolution, we found that fixation point offsets had no effect on the occurrence of microsaccades and that the occurrence of microsaccades had no impact on the magnitude of gap effect. Microsaccades therefore do not appear to play any part in the production of the gap effect.

摘要

在周边视觉目标出现前不久或同时熄灭注视点,会减少朝向该目标的扫视潜伏期。萨斯洛(1967年)推测,这种间隙效应可能会出现,是因为注视点偏移减少了伴有扫视不应期的校正性微扫视的发生率。在本研究中,获得了显著的间隙效应。然而,使用分辨率为1分视角的浦肯野图像眼动仪,我们发现注视点偏移对微扫视的发生没有影响,并且微扫视的发生对间隙效应的大小没有影响。因此,微扫视似乎在间隙效应的产生中不起任何作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验