Saks E
University of Southern California Law Center, University Park, Los Angeles 90089, USA.
Psychiatr Q. 1995 Summer;66(2):119-31. doi: 10.1007/BF02238859.
Because multiple personality disorder (MPD) is more frequently diagnosed today than in the past, it is likely that more multiples will plead insanity. The courts are in a state of disarray as to how best to respond to these pleas. This article considers multiples' responsibility on three interpretations of the status of their alters: that they are different people; that they are different personalities; or that they are parts of one complex, deeply divided personality. On all three theories multiples are nonresponsible. Nevertheless, three rare circumstances exist under which multiples should be found guilty. The article concludes by indicating the kinds of issues psychiatry might explore to further assist the law in its analysis of the criminal responsibility of multiples.
由于如今多重人格障碍(MPD)的诊断比过去更为频繁,很可能会有更多的多重人格患者以精神错乱为由进行抗辩。法院对于如何最好地回应这些抗辩处于混乱状态。本文从对其人格交替状态的三种解释来考量多重人格患者的责任:即他们是不同的人;他们是不同的人格;或者他们是一个复杂、深度分裂人格的组成部分。基于这三种理论,多重人格患者都无需承担责任。然而,存在三种罕见情况,在这些情况下多重人格患者应被判有罪。本文最后指出了精神病学可能会探索的各类问题,以进一步协助法律分析多重人格患者的刑事责任。