Suppr超能文献

是我的脑植入物让我这么做的吗?脑深部电刺激引发的关于心理连续性、行为责任和心理能力的问题。

Did My Brain Implant Make Me Do It? Questions Raised by DBS Regarding Psychological Continuity, Responsibility for Action and Mental Competence.

作者信息

Klaming Laura, Haselager Pim

机构信息

Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society, Tilburg University, P. O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neuroethics. 2013;6(3):527-539. doi: 10.1007/s12152-010-9093-1. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-accepted treatment for movement disorders and is currently explored as a treatment option for various neurological and psychiatric disorders. Several case studies suggest that DBS may, in some patients, influence mental states critical to personality to such an extent that it affects an individual's personal identity, i.e. the experience of psychological continuity, of persisting through time as the same person. Without questioning the usefulness of DBS as a treatment option for various serious and treatment refractory conditions, the potential of disruptions of psychological continuity raises a number of ethical and legal questions. An important question is that of legal responsibility if DBS induced changes in a patient's personality result in damage caused by undesirable or even deviant behavior. Disruptions in psychological continuity can in some cases also have an effect on an individual's mental competence. This capacity is necessary in order to obtain informed consent to start, continue or stop treatment, and it is therefore not only important from an ethical point of view but also has legal consequences. Taking the existing literature and the Dutch legal system as a starting point, the present paper discusses the implications of DBS induced disruptions in psychological continuity for a patient's responsibility for action and competence of decision and raises a number of questions that need further research.

摘要

深部脑刺激(DBS)是一种被广泛接受的运动障碍治疗方法,目前正在探索其作为各种神经和精神疾病的治疗选择。一些案例研究表明,在某些患者中,DBS可能会在一定程度上影响对人格至关重要的心理状态,进而影响个人的身份认同,即作为同一个人在时间上持续存在的心理连续性体验。在不质疑DBS作为各种严重和难治性疾病治疗选择的有效性的前提下,心理连续性中断的可能性引发了一些伦理和法律问题。一个重要的问题是,如果DBS导致患者人格改变,进而导致不良甚至异常行为造成损害,法律责任该如何界定。心理连续性的中断在某些情况下也可能对个人的心智能力产生影响。这种能力对于获得关于开始、继续或停止治疗的知情同意是必要的,因此,这不仅从伦理角度来看很重要,而且还具有法律后果。本文以现有文献和荷兰法律体系为出发点,探讨了DBS引起的心理连续性中断对患者行为责任和决策能力的影响,并提出了一些需要进一步研究的问题。

相似文献

2
The ethics of deep brain stimulation (DBS).深部脑刺激(DBS)的伦理学
Med Health Care Philos. 2015 Nov;18(4):475-85. doi: 10.1007/s11019-015-9622-0.
3
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
6
Ethical considerations in deep brain stimulation for psychiatric illness.脑深部电刺激治疗精神疾病的伦理问题。
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Jan;21(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
7
[Ethical aspects of deep brain stimulation in the treatment of psychiatric disorders].[深部脑刺激治疗精神疾病的伦理问题]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2010 May;78(5):269-78. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245208. Epub 2010 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

6
The spectrum of responsibility ascription for end users of neurotechnologies.神经技术终端用户的责任归因范围。
Neuroethics. 2021 Dec;14(3):423-435. doi: 10.1007/s12152-021-09460-0. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
7
10
Criminal Responsibility and Neuroscience: No Revolution Yet.刑事责任与神经科学:尚未发生变革。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 27;10:1406. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01406. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

2
Preparing the ethical future of deep brain stimulation.为脑深部电刺激的伦理未来做好准备。
Surg Neurol. 2009 Dec;72(6):577-86; discussion 586. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.03.029. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
3
Stimulating brains, altering minds.刺激大脑,改变思维。
J Med Ethics. 2009 May;35(5):289-92. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.027789.
8
Subcallosal cingulate gyrus deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.扣带回下区深部脑刺激治疗难治性抑郁症。
Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Sep 15;64(6):461-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.05.034. Epub 2008 Jul 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验