Klaming Laura, Haselager Pim
Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society, Tilburg University, P. O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Neuroethics. 2013;6(3):527-539. doi: 10.1007/s12152-010-9093-1. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-accepted treatment for movement disorders and is currently explored as a treatment option for various neurological and psychiatric disorders. Several case studies suggest that DBS may, in some patients, influence mental states critical to personality to such an extent that it affects an individual's personal identity, i.e. the experience of psychological continuity, of persisting through time as the same person. Without questioning the usefulness of DBS as a treatment option for various serious and treatment refractory conditions, the potential of disruptions of psychological continuity raises a number of ethical and legal questions. An important question is that of legal responsibility if DBS induced changes in a patient's personality result in damage caused by undesirable or even deviant behavior. Disruptions in psychological continuity can in some cases also have an effect on an individual's mental competence. This capacity is necessary in order to obtain informed consent to start, continue or stop treatment, and it is therefore not only important from an ethical point of view but also has legal consequences. Taking the existing literature and the Dutch legal system as a starting point, the present paper discusses the implications of DBS induced disruptions in psychological continuity for a patient's responsibility for action and competence of decision and raises a number of questions that need further research.
深部脑刺激(DBS)是一种被广泛接受的运动障碍治疗方法,目前正在探索其作为各种神经和精神疾病的治疗选择。一些案例研究表明,在某些患者中,DBS可能会在一定程度上影响对人格至关重要的心理状态,进而影响个人的身份认同,即作为同一个人在时间上持续存在的心理连续性体验。在不质疑DBS作为各种严重和难治性疾病治疗选择的有效性的前提下,心理连续性中断的可能性引发了一些伦理和法律问题。一个重要的问题是,如果DBS导致患者人格改变,进而导致不良甚至异常行为造成损害,法律责任该如何界定。心理连续性的中断在某些情况下也可能对个人的心智能力产生影响。这种能力对于获得关于开始、继续或停止治疗的知情同意是必要的,因此,这不仅从伦理角度来看很重要,而且还具有法律后果。本文以现有文献和荷兰法律体系为出发点,探讨了DBS引起的心理连续性中断对患者行为责任和决策能力的影响,并提出了一些需要进一步研究的问题。