Romanovsky A A, Blatteis C M
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Tennessee at Memphis 38163, USA.
Am J Physiol. 1995 Aug;269(2 Pt 2):R280-6. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1995.269.2.R280.
The mechanism of initiation of the second body temperature (Tb) rise of the typically biphasic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) fever is not known. This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that the second Tb rise during fever may be initiated as a direct consequence of the elevated Tb of the first febrile rise. Experiments were conducted in conscious guinea pigs implanted with intraperitoneal thermodes, intravenous catheters, and intrahypothalamic thermocouples. Intraperitoneal cooling (IPC) was performed by perfusing water (22 degrees C) through the thermode under afebrile conditions during the first (0-40 min after pyrogen injection) or second (80-120 min) phase of the biphasic LPS (2 g/kg iv) fever or during a monophasic LPS (0.5 g/kg iv) fever. Throughout IPC, the rate of heat withdrawal was maintained at 11.6 +/- 1.2 mW/g. No IPC was performed in the corresponding controls. When started immediately after LPS administration at the higher dose, IPC completely blocked the first phase of the biphasic fever. This blockade was followed by a Tb rise, which, although similar to the rise in the second phase, might alternatively be interpreted as the delayed occurrence of the first phase previously suppressed by IPC. However, we excluded the later possibility by showing the absence of an overshoot in Tb restoration after IPC applied during the second phase of biphasic fever, during monophasic fever, or under afebrile conditions. We conclude, therefore, that the second Tb rise of biphasic LPS fever is not induced by the elevated Tb of the first febrile phase. The cause of the second peak of the characteristic biphasic febrile response to intravenous LPS remains speculative.
典型双相性脂多糖(LPS)发热时第二次体温(Tb)升高的起始机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在验证以下假说:发热期间的第二次Tb升高可能是第一次发热性升高时Tb升高的直接后果。实验在植入腹腔热电极、静脉导管和下丘脑内热电偶的清醒豚鼠身上进行。在双相性LPS(2 g/kg静脉注射)发热的第一阶段(注射致热原后0 - 40分钟)或第二阶段(80 - 120分钟)或单相性LPS(0.5 g/kg静脉注射)发热期间,在无热条件下通过热电极灌注水(22℃)进行腹腔冷却(IPC)。在整个IPC过程中,散热速率维持在11.6±1.2 mW/g。相应的对照组未进行IPC。当在较高剂量LPS给药后立即开始时,IPC完全阻断了双相性发热的第一阶段。这种阻断之后是Tb升高,尽管与第二阶段的升高相似,但也可以解释为先前被IPC抑制的第一阶段的延迟出现。然而,我们通过显示在双相性发热的第二阶段、单相性发热期间或无热条件下应用IPC后Tb恢复没有过冲,排除了后一种可能性。因此,我们得出结论,双相性LPS发热的第二次Tb升高不是由第一发热阶段Tb升高诱导的。静脉注射LPS时特征性双相性发热反应的第二个峰值的原因仍然是推测性的。