Pertile T L, Sharma J M, Walser M M
Department of Veterinary PathoBiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108, USA.
Cell Immunol. 1995 Sep;164(2):207-16. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1995.1163.
In this study, we examined the mechanisms by which avian reovirus infection of chickens depresses in vitro proliferative responses of spleen cells to T cell mitogens. We showed an enhanced production of nitric oxide (NO) by phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated spleen cells from reovirus-infected birds but not from virus-free birds. Since macrophages are a primary source of NO, we compared splenic adherent macrophages from virus-free and virus-exposed chickens. There was a fourfold increase in the number of adherent macrophages from the spleens of virus-exposed chickens. Production of NO by macrophages from virus-exposed chickens required T-cell-produced factors and was not due to direct stimulation of macrophages by PHA. Although T cell products were needed for NO production by macrophages, in an apparent paradox, we found significantly reduced levels of NO-inducing activity in the supernatants of PHA-stimulated spleen cells from virus-exposed chickens than in supernatants from PHA-stimulated normal spleen cells. Cocultures of adherent cells from infected chickens with normal spleen cells indicated that although macrophages secreted NO following PHA stimulation, macrophages ultimately suppressed the continued production of NO-inducing factors by normal spleen cells. We further showed in experiments utilizing NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, an NO synthesis inhibitor, that NO was not responsible for the mitogenic inhibition of spleen cells from virus-exposed chickens. In summary, our results indicated that following reovirus infection, macrophages are primed in vivo and activated in vitro by T-cell-produced factors. Despite the requirement of T cell cytokines for NO production, T cells did not proliferate to mitogenic stimuli, which indicated that the early events (i.e., cytokine secretion) but not the late events (i.e., proliferation) of the T cell activation cascade were functional. Macrophage priming following reovirus infection may have important implications for impaired T cell responsiveness.
在本研究中,我们探讨了禽呼肠孤病毒感染鸡后,抑制脾脏细胞对T细胞有丝分裂原体外增殖反应的机制。我们发现,经植物血凝素(PHA)刺激后,感染呼肠孤病毒鸡的脾脏细胞产生一氧化氮(NO)的量增加,而未感染病毒鸡的脾脏细胞则未出现这种情况。由于巨噬细胞是NO的主要来源,我们比较了未感染病毒和感染病毒鸡脾脏中的贴壁巨噬细胞。感染病毒鸡脾脏中贴壁巨噬细胞的数量增加了四倍。感染病毒鸡巨噬细胞产生NO需要T细胞产生的因子,并非PHA直接刺激巨噬细胞所致。尽管巨噬细胞产生NO需要T细胞产物,但自相矛盾的是,我们发现感染病毒鸡经PHA刺激的脾脏细胞上清液中NO诱导活性水平,明显低于经PHA刺激正常脾脏细胞上清液中的水平。感染鸡的贴壁细胞与正常脾脏细胞共培养表明,虽然PHA刺激后巨噬细胞分泌了NO,但巨噬细胞最终抑制了正常脾脏细胞持续产生NO诱导因子。我们在利用NO合成抑制剂NG-单甲基-L-精氨酸的实验中进一步表明,NO并非感染病毒鸡脾脏细胞有丝分裂抑制的原因。总之,我们的结果表明,呼肠孤病毒感染后,巨噬细胞在体内被致敏,并在体外被T细胞产生的因子激活。尽管T细胞细胞因子是产生NO所必需的,但T细胞对有丝分裂刺激并未增殖,这表明T细胞激活级联反应的早期事件(即细胞因子分泌)而非晚期事件(即增殖)具有功能。呼肠孤病毒感染后巨噬细胞的致敏可能对T细胞反应性受损具有重要意义。