Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎的分类标准。

Classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

MacGregor A J

机构信息

Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.

出版信息

Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1995 May;9(2):287-304. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3579(05)80191-8.

Abstract

The development of classification schemes for RA in the last 40 years has followed the increasingly precise understanding of the nature of the clinical disease and the recognition of the different requirements of classification methods in clinic and population settings. In published studies of RA in clinic patients the most widely used criteria sets have been the 1958 ARA (ACR) criteria and its 1961 adaptation (the Rome (active) criteria). These sets classified disease as 'classical', 'definite', 'probable' and 'possible' RA based on criteria comprising clinical, serological, radiological and histological features (the latter were dropped from the Rome criteria set because of their impracticality). More recently, a new criteria set (the 1987 ARA criteria) has been developed using statistical techniques. This set was derived using RA cases and controls attending hospital clinics. It is based on the earlier criteria sets but accommodates the characteristic pattern of joint involvement in RA more precisely. The criteria recognize only the single disease category of 'rheumatoid arthritis'. In validation studies, the 1987 criteria set has been found to have enhanced specificity over earlier schemes in clinic-based studies of RA. The sensitivity may, however, be reduced, in particular in studies of early disease. The application of classification criteria for case recognition in the population and family studies of RA has proved more problematic. In these settings, there is the additional requirement to recognize individuals with remitted and inactive disease as RA cases. The 1966 New York criteria were developed for this specific purpose, however their format proved cumbersome and they have not been widely adopted. The 1987 criteria set is insufficiently sensitive to recognize inactive disease if the criteria are applied exactly as they have been defined. The sensitivity of the 1987 criteria set is, however, substantially enhanced if the criteria are adapted to incorporate features of past disease activity, for example by allowing deformity to substitute for swelling and by incorporating data on the past occurrence of rheumatoid factor and rheumatoid nodules. Developments in the immunology and genetics of RA may in the future provide more accurate tools for classification and may lead to recognition of more precise disease subsets. At present, however, the 1987 ARA criteria provide the most appropriate basis for case recognition in both clinic and population-based studies.

摘要

在过去40年里,类风湿关节炎(RA)分类方案的发展是随着对该临床疾病本质的认识日益精确,以及对临床和群体环境中分类方法不同要求的认识而发展的。在已发表的关于临床患者RA的研究中,使用最广泛的标准集是1958年美国风湿病学会(ARA)标准及其1961年的修订版(罗马(活动期)标准)。这些标准集根据包括临床、血清学、放射学和组织学特征的标准,将疾病分为“典型”“肯定”“可能”和“疑似”RA(由于不实用,后者从罗马标准集中删除)。最近,使用统计技术制定了一套新的标准集(1987年ARA标准)。该标准集是根据在医院诊所就诊的RA病例和对照得出的。它基于早期的标准集,但更精确地适应了RA关节受累的特征模式,并只认可“类风湿关节炎”这一单一疾病类别。在验证研究中,发现在基于临床的RA研究中,1987年标准集比早期方案具有更高的特异性。然而,其敏感性可能会降低,尤其是在早期疾病的研究中。在RA的人群和家族研究中,应用分类标准进行病例识别已被证明更具问题。在这些情况下,还需要将病情缓解和非活动期的个体识别为RA病例。1966年纽约标准就是为此特定目的而制定的,然而其形式被证明很繁琐,未被广泛采用。如果严格按照所定义的标准应用,1987年标准集对识别非活动期疾病的敏感性不足。然而,如果对标准进行调整以纳入过去疾病活动的特征,例如允许畸形替代肿胀,并纳入类风湿因子和类风湿结节过去出现的数据,1987年标准集的敏感性会大幅提高。RA免疫学和遗传学的发展未来可能会提供更准确的分类工具,并可能导致识别出更精确的疾病亚组。然而,目前1987年ARA标准为临床和基于人群的研究中的病例识别提供了最合适的基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验