• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

活动性类风湿关节炎的罗马标准(等同于美国风湿病学会1958年标准)与美国风湿病学会1987年类风湿关节炎标准的横断面及纵向比较。

A cross-sectional and longitudinal comparison of the Rome criteria for active rheumatoid arthritis (equivalent to the American College of Rheumatology 1958 criteria) and the American College of Rheumatology 1987 criteria for rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Jacobsson L T, Knowler W C, Pillemer S, Hanson R L, Pettitt D J, McCance D R, Bennett P H

机构信息

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Phoenix, Arizona.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Oct;37(10):1479-86. doi: 10.1002/art.1780371011.

DOI:10.1002/art.1780371011
PMID:7945473
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic properties of the Rome 1961 criteria for active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR; formerly, the American Rheumatism Association) 1987 criteria for RA with regard to their ability to classify, diagnose, and predict outcome in RA.

METHODS

Analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal data from repeated health examinations and review of clinical records of 3,509 Pima Indians followed up from January 1966 to December 1990.

RESULTS

The ACR 1987 criteria identified approximately 50% of the cases identified by the Rome 1961 criteria, in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. The ACR 1987 criteria were better predictors of subsequent development of a clinically supported diagnosis and treatment with slow-acting antirheumatic drugs (both P < 0.001), but were less sensitive than the Rome 1961 criteria for detecting cases for which there already was a clinically supported diagnosis (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a population-based analysis, the ACR 1987 criteria are less sensitive for detecting clinical disease, but predict a clinically more severe prognosis, compared with the Rome 1961 criteria. The sensitivity of both sets of criteria to identify clinical disease is improved if multiple examinations or inactive disease are taken into account.

摘要

目的

比较1961年罗马标准对活动期类风湿关节炎(RA)的诊断特性以及美国风湿病学会(ACR;原美国风湿病协会)1987年RA标准在RA分类、诊断及预测结局方面的能力。

方法

分析1966年1月至1990年12月对3509名皮马印第安人进行重复健康检查得到的横断面和纵向数据,并查阅其临床记录。

结果

在横断面和纵向分析中,1987年ACR标准识别出的病例约为1961年罗马标准识别出病例的50%。1987年ACR标准对随后临床上支持的诊断及使用慢作用抗风湿药物治疗的预测性更好(均P<0.001),但在检测已有临床支持诊断的病例方面不如1961年罗马标准敏感(P<0.001)。

结论

在基于人群的分析中,与1961年罗马标准相比,1987年ACR标准在检测临床疾病方面敏感性较低,但预测的临床预后更严重。如果考虑多次检查或非活动期疾病,两组标准识别临床疾病的敏感性均会提高。

相似文献

1
A cross-sectional and longitudinal comparison of the Rome criteria for active rheumatoid arthritis (equivalent to the American College of Rheumatology 1958 criteria) and the American College of Rheumatology 1987 criteria for rheumatoid arthritis.活动性类风湿关节炎的罗马标准(等同于美国风湿病学会1958年标准)与美国风湿病学会1987年类风湿关节炎标准的横断面及纵向比较。
Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Oct;37(10):1479-86. doi: 10.1002/art.1780371011.
2
Classification of rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria.类风湿关节炎的分类:1987年美国风湿病学会标准与2010年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟标准的比较。
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Jan;63(1):37-42. doi: 10.1002/art.30100.
3
Ability of the American College of Rheumatology 1987 criteria to predict rheumatoid arthritis in patients with early arthritis and classification of these patients two years later.美国风湿病学会1987年标准预测早期关节炎患者类风湿关节炎的能力及两年后这些患者的分类
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Nov;44(11):2485-91. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200111)44:11<2485::aid-art428>3.0.co;2-s.
4
Comparison of the 1987 ACR and 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: a prospective cohort study.临床实践中比较 1987 ACR 和 2010 ACR/EULAR 类风湿关节炎分类标准:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2013;42(5):362-8. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2013.776103. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
5
[Multicenter performance of the different classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis].[类风湿关节炎不同分类标准的多中心表现]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Oct 18;52(5):897-901. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.05.017.
6
Bilateral evaluation of the hand and wrist in untreated early inflammatory arthritis: a comparative study of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.未经治疗的早期炎症性关节炎患者手部和腕部的双侧评估:超声与磁共振成像的对比研究。
J Rheumatol. 2013 Aug;40(8):1282-92. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120713. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
7
Comparison of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism criteria for classification of rheumatoid arthritis in the Nurses' Health Study cohorts.比较美国风湿病学会 1987 年和 2010 年标准与美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟标准在护士健康研究队列中对类风湿关节炎的分类。
Rheumatol Int. 2014 Mar;34(3):407-11. doi: 10.1007/s00296-013-2865-2. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
8
Comparison of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism and the 1987 American Rheumatism Association classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in an early arthritis cohort in New Zealand.新西兰早期关节炎队列中比较 2010 年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟与 1987 年美国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎分类标准。
J Rheumatol. 2012 Nov;39(11):2098-103. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120226. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
9
Postpublication validation of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: where do we stand?2010 年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟类风湿关节炎分类标准的发表后验证:我们处于什么位置?
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2013 Mar;25(2):157-63. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32835cfc41.
10
The clinical picture of rheumatoid arthritis according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria: is this still the same disease?根据2010年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟标准的类风湿关节炎临床症状:这仍然是同一种疾病吗?
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Feb;64(2):389-93. doi: 10.1002/art.33348.

引用本文的文献

1
"Stiffness has different meanings, I think, to everyone": examining stiffness from the perspective of people living with rheumatoid arthritis.“僵硬对每个人来说可能都有不同的含义”:从类风湿关节炎患者的角度审视僵硬。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Nov;66(11):1662-72. doi: 10.1002/acr.22374.
2
MRI characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis in the temporomandibular joint.MRI 特征在颞下颌关节类风湿性关节炎。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(4):31627230. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/31627230. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
3
Diagnostic evaluation of classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and reactive arthritis in an early synovitis outpatient clinic.
早期滑膜炎门诊类风湿关节炎和反应性关节炎分类标准的诊断评估
Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 May;58(5):278-80. doi: 10.1136/ard.58.5.278.
4
Establishing the level of digitization for wrist and hand radiographs for the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.确定第三次全国健康与营养检查调查中手腕和手部X光片的数字化水平。
J Digit Imaging. 1998 Aug;11(3):116-20. doi: 10.1007/BF03168734.
5
Cigarette smoking and rheumatoid arthritis severity.吸烟与类风湿关节炎的严重程度
Ann Rheum Dis. 1997 Aug;56(8):463-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.56.8.463.