Fingerhut A, Hay J M, Delalande J P, Paquet J C
Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Sep;38(9):926-32. doi: 10.1007/BF02049727.
Because evacuation of effusion or collection could depend on the type of drainage, we compared the effects of closed suction drainage with passive drainage through tubes or undulated drains after abdominoperineal rectal excision for carcinoma on early and late perineal wound healing.
Of 234 consecutive patients undergoing abdominoperineal rectal excision for carcinoma between January 1983 and August 1990, unsatisfactory hemostasis or gross intraoperative septic contamination were recorded in 48 patients who were not included in the trial. After rectal excision and closure of the perineum, the remaining 186 patients were randomized to receive passive drainage (PD; n = 96) or closed suction drainage (SD; n = 90). Eighteen patients were withdrawn because of protocol violation, and three were lost to follow-up, leaving 165 (89 PD and 76 SD) patients for analysis. Preoperative factors (sex, age, degree of obesity, weight loss, anemia, or presence of ascites), intraoperative and pathologic findings (Dukes stage), and postoperative courses (recurrence, late mortality) were similar in both groups. All patients were followed up for 12 months or until death.
The rate of perineums healed at one month was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in PD (55/89 = 61 percent) compared with SD (54/72 = 75 percent) patients. At three months, the rate of healed perineums no longer differed between the two groups (70/87 = 81 percent vs. 60/72 = 84 percent). The number of vaginal fistulas, secondary reopenings, and perineums not healed at 12 months was similar in both groups. Median duration to complete healing was similar in both groups (23 vs. 21 days, respectively). On the other hand, three retained drains were seen in PD patients only. The median duration of hospital stay was identical in both groups (22 days). Seven patients died in the early postoperative period, including one in the PD group and six in the SD group. There was no significant difference in the number of late deaths (3 vs. 7) in PD and SD patients, respectively.
These results suggest that closed suction drainage should be used after abdominoperineal rectal excision with satisfactory hemostasis or absence of gross introperative septic contamination.
由于积液或积脓的引流可能取决于引流方式,我们比较了在腹会阴直肠癌切除术后,密闭式负压引流与通过管道或波纹引流管进行的被动引流对会阴伤口早期和晚期愈合的影响。
在1983年1月至1990年8月期间连续接受腹会阴直肠癌切除术的234例患者中,48例因止血效果不佳或术中存在严重感染污染而未纳入试验。直肠切除并关闭会阴后,其余186例患者被随机分为接受被动引流(PD;n = 96)或密闭式负压引流(SD;n = 90)。18例患者因违反方案退出,3例失访,最终165例(89例PD和76例SD)患者纳入分析。两组患者的术前因素(性别、年龄、肥胖程度、体重减轻、贫血或腹水情况)、术中及病理结果(Dukes分期)和术后病程(复发、晚期死亡率)相似。所有患者随访12个月或直至死亡。
PD组(55/89 = 61%)术后1个月会阴愈合率显著低于SD组(54/72 = 75%)(P < 0.05)。3个月时,两组会阴愈合率无差异(70/87 = 81%对60/72 = 84%)。两组患者12个月时阴道瘘、二次切口裂开及会阴未愈合的数量相似。两组完全愈合的中位时间相似(分别为23天和21天)。另一方面,仅在PD组患者中发现3根引流管残留。两组患者的中位住院时间相同(22天)。7例患者在术后早期死亡,其中PD组1例,SD组6例。PD组和SD组晚期死亡人数分别为3例和7例,无显著差异。
这些结果表明,在腹会阴直肠癌切除术后,若止血效果满意或术中无严重感染污染,应采用密闭式负压引流。