• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择很重要:参保者对其健康保险计划的看法。

Choice matters: enrollees' views of their health plans.

作者信息

Davis K, Collins K S, Schoen C, Morris C

机构信息

Commonwealth Fund, Rice University, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1995 Summer;14(2):99-112. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.14.2.99.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.14.2.99
PMID:7657265
Abstract

Enrollees' views of their health plans and physicians are important measures of the performance of the health care system. The Commonwealth Fund's 1994 survey of 3,000 adults in fee-for-service and managed care organizations documents enrollees' experiences with choosing a plan and satisfaction with that plan. Fee-for-service enrollees were more satisfied with their plan's access to and quality of care; managed care enrollees were more satisfied with their plan's cost, paperwork, and coverage of preventive care. The survey also found a high rate of involuntary plan changing, limited choice of physicians, and low levels of satisfaction among low-income managed care enrollees.

摘要

参保者对其健康保险计划和医生的看法是衡量医疗保健系统绩效的重要指标。联邦基金1994年对3000名参加按服务收费和管理式医疗组织的成年人进行的调查记录了参保者选择保险计划的经历以及对该计划的满意度。按服务收费的参保者对其保险计划的医疗服务可及性和质量更为满意;管理式医疗的参保者对其保险计划的成本、文书工作和预防性保健覆盖范围更为满意。该调查还发现非自愿更换保险计划的比例很高、医生选择有限以及低收入管理式医疗参保者的满意度较低。

相似文献

1
Choice matters: enrollees' views of their health plans.选择很重要:参保者对其健康保险计划的看法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1995 Summer;14(2):99-112. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.14.2.99.
2
Women and managed care: satisfaction with provider choice, access to care, plan costs and coverage.女性与管理式医疗:对医疗服务提供者选择、医疗可及性、计划成本和保险范围的满意度。
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 1997 Spring;52(2):60-4.
3
Satisfaction and choice: a view from the plans.满意度与选择:来自各项计划的视角
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 May-Jun;16(3):209-17. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.3.209.
4
Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.传统医疗保险与管理式医疗保险绩效比较。
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1744-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1744.
5
State Policies And Enrollees' Experiences In Medicaid: Evidence From A New National Survey.州政策与医疗补助参保者的体验:一项新全国调查的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Oct;37(10):1647-1655. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0505.
6
Evaluation of Medicaid managed care. Satisfaction, access, and use.医疗补助管理式医疗评估。满意度、可及性与使用情况。
JAMA. 1996 Jul 3;276(1):50-5.
7
Two views of managed care's quality.管理式医疗质量的两种观点。
Manag Care. 1995 Sep;4(9):60.
8
No exit? The effect of health status on dissatisfaction and disenrollment from health plans.无路可退?健康状况对健康保险计划不满及退出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun;34(2):547-76.
9
Impact of the Oregon Health Plan on access and satisfaction of adults with low income.俄勒冈健康计划对低收入成年人医疗服务可及性和满意度的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Feb;37(1):11-31.
10
Personal choices of health plans by managed care experts.
Med Care. 2002 May;40(5):375-86. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200205000-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
North Carolina's Medicaid Transformation: the Early Enrollee Experience.北卡罗来纳州医疗补助计划的转型:早期参保者的体验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Nov;38(15):3295-3302. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08319-9. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
2
Three years in - changing plan features in the U.S. health insurance marketplace.三年来,美国医保市场不断调整计划特色。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3198-3.
3
Inpatient satisfaction with medical information received from caregivers: an observational study on the effect of social deprivation.
住院患者对从医护人员处获得的医疗信息的满意度:一项关于社会剥夺影响的观察性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2728-8.
4
Market characteristics and awareness of managed care options among elderly beneficiaries enrolled in traditional Medicare.参加传统医疗保险的老年受益人的市场特征及对管理式医疗选择的认知。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2011 Oct 14;1(3):E1-19. doi: 10.5600/mmrr.001.03.a03.
5
Reduced mortality: the unexpected impact of a telephone-based care management intervention for older adults in managed care.死亡率降低:基于电话的护理管理干预措施对管理式医疗中老年人产生的意外影响。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1632-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00668.x.
6
Narrowing the income gaps in preventive care for young children: families in healthy steps.缩小幼儿预防性保健方面的收入差距:参与“健康起步”项目的家庭
J Urban Health. 2004 Dec;81(4):556-67. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jth140.
7
Patient choice. A randomized controlled trial of provider selection.患者选择。一项关于医疗服务提供者选择的随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 May;18(5):319-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20145.x.
8
Vulnerability and the patient-practitioner relationship: the roles of gatekeeping and primary care performance.脆弱性与医患关系:守门作用与初级医疗服务绩效的角色
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jan;93(1):138-44. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.1.138.
9
Effects of CAHPS health plan performance information on plan choices by New Jersey Medicaid beneficiaries.CAHPS健康计划绩效信息对新泽西医疗补助受益人选计划的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Aug;37(4):985-1007. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2002.62.x.
10
You can't leap a chasm in two jumps: The Institute of Medicine health care quality report.你无法分两步跨越鸿沟:医学研究所医疗质量报告。
Public Health Rep. 2001 Sep-Oct;116(5):396-403. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.5.396.