Camire R M, Kalafatis M, Cushman M, Tracy R P, Mann K G, Tracy P B
Department of Biochemistry, University of Vermont, Burlington 05405, USA.
J Biol Chem. 1995 Sep 1;270(35):20794-800. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.35.20794.
The inactivation of human platelet factor Va by activated protein C (APC) was analyzed by functional assessment of cofactor activity and Western blotting analysis to visualize the factor Va fragments accompanying proteolysis. Platelets were treated with thrombin to facilitate both their activation as well as the release and further activation of platelet factor Va, followed by APC addition. The rates of inactivation were donor-dependent such that 15-60% of the initial cofactor activity was lost within 5 min of APC addition with as much as 10-20% of the activity still remaining after 2 h of incubation. Western blot analysis using a monoclonal antibody that recognizes an epitope between amino acid residues 307 and 506 of the factor V molecule suggested that the factor Va activity resistant to APC inactivation was due to residual heavy chain. Furthermore, in contrast to studies with normal plasma-derived factor Va, two possible cleavage mechanisms could explain the platelet factor Va fragments observed. APC can cleave platelet factor Va initially at Arg506, with subsequent cleavages occurring at Arg306 and Arg679. Alternatively, APC can cleave at Arg306 initially, with further cleavage at Arg679 then at Arg506 or at Arg506 followed by cleavage at Arg679. Similar results were obtained if platelets were removed from the inactivation mixtures and phospholipid vesicles were used to supply the membrane surface required for inactivation, suggesting that the order of platelet factor Va peptide bond cleavage or the amount of cofactor activity remaining was not altered by either of these surfaces. Thus, APC is unable to effect the complete inactivation of platelet factor Va, even though it would appear that the same cleavages which render the plasma cofactor inactive are occurring in the platelet cofactor. Analogous protocols were used to study an individual heterozygous for the Arg506-->Gln506 mutation (Factor V Leiden, Factor VR506Q). With respect to the mutant platelet factor Va in the presence of APC, > 70% of the initial cofactor activity remained after 1 min, with 30% activity still remaining after 2 h. As seen in studies of the APC-catalyzed inactivation of plasma factor VaR506Q, proteolysis of the mutant platelet factor Va confirms that even though cleavage at Arg306 will occur in the absence of cleavage at Arg506, the rate of inactivation is slower. Collectively these data suggest that when compared to normal plasma factor Va, differences in normal platelet factor Va which define: 1) whether the heavy chain is susceptible to cleavage at Arg306 or Arg506 and 2) the extent to which it is cleaved initially at Arg306, in contrast to cleavage of Arg506, will define both the extent and rate of inactivation.
通过辅因子活性功能评估和蛋白质印迹分析来观察伴随蛋白水解的因子Va片段,从而分析活化蛋白C(APC)对人血小板因子Va的失活作用。用凝血酶处理血小板,以促进其活化以及血小板因子Va的释放和进一步活化,随后添加APC。失活速率因供体而异,使得在添加APC后5分钟内,初始辅因子活性的15%-60%丧失,孵育2小时后仍有10%-20%的活性残留。使用识别因子V分子氨基酸残基307和506之间表位的单克隆抗体进行蛋白质印迹分析表明,对APC失活具有抗性的因子Va活性归因于残留的重链。此外,与正常血浆来源的因子Va的研究不同,两种可能的切割机制可以解释所观察到的血小板因子Va片段。APC最初可以在Arg506处切割血小板因子Va,随后在Arg306和Arg679处发生切割。或者,APC最初可以在Arg306处切割,然后在Arg679处进一步切割,接着在Arg506处切割;或者在Arg506处切割,随后在Arg679处切割。如果从失活混合物中去除血小板并使用磷脂囊泡提供失活所需的膜表面,也会得到类似的结果,这表明血小板因子Va肽键切割的顺序或剩余辅因子活性的量不会因这些表面中的任何一个而改变。因此,即使使血浆辅因子失活的相同切割似乎也在血小板辅因子中发生,但APC仍无法使血小板因子Va完全失活。使用类似的实验方案研究了Arg506→Gln506突变(因子V莱顿,因子VR506Q)的个体杂合子。对于存在APC时的突变型血小板因子Va,1分钟后初始辅因子活性的>70%仍然保留,2小时后仍有30%的活性保留。正如在APC催化的血浆因子VaR506Q失活研究中所见,突变型血小板因子Va的蛋白水解证实,即使在没有Arg506切割的情况下会发生Arg306切割,但失活速率较慢。总体而言,这些数据表明,与正常血浆因子Va相比,正常血小板因子Va的差异在于:1)重链是否易在Arg306或Arg506处切割;2)与Arg506切割相比,其在Arg306处初始切割的程度,这将决定失活的程度和速率。