Klein R
Centre for the Analysis of Social Policy, School of Social Sciences, University of Bath, England.
Milbank Q. 1995;73(3):299-337.
The costs and benefits are examined of one of the very few examples of a government driving through health care reform in the face of near unanimous opposition: Britain's 1991 reforms of the National Health Service (NHS), which sought to inject the dynamics of a market into the framework of a universal, tax-financed service. The political costs to the government have been high. The public continues to see the NHS through the eyes of disgruntled doctors and nurses. The benefits, measured in efficiency gains or service improvements, are as yet difficult to establish. However, the NHS has changed in key respects. The balance has shifted from hospital specialists to general practitioners and from providers to purchasers, with increasing emphasis on professional accountability and consumerism. But the NHS continues to evolve as it strives to resolve the tensions implicit in the reforms, and the only certainty is that no future government can return to the pre-1991 situation.
英国1991年的国民医疗服务体系(NHS)改革,该改革旨在将市场活力注入全民税收资助服务的框架之中。政府为此付出的政治代价高昂。公众仍然透过心怀不满的医生和护士的视角看待国民医疗服务体系。以效率提升或服务改善来衡量的收益,目前仍难以确定。然而,国民医疗服务体系在关键方面已经发生了变化。平衡已从医院专科医生转向全科医生,从服务提供者转向购买者,同时越来越强调专业问责制和消费主义。但国民医疗服务体系在努力解决改革中隐含的矛盾时仍在不断演变,唯一可以确定的是,未来没有任何一届政府能够回归到1991年以前的状况。