Carpenter R H, Williams M L
Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK.
Nature. 1995 Sep 7;377(6544):59-62. doi: 10.1038/377059a0.
The latency between the appearance of a visual target and the start of the saccadic eye movement made to look at it varies from trial to trial to an extent that is inexplicable in terms of ordinary 'physiological' processes such as synaptic delays and conduction velocities. An alternative interpretation is that it represents the time needed to decide whether a target is in fact present: decision processes are necessarily stochastic, because they depend on extracting information from noisy sensory signals. In one such model, the presence of a target causes a signal in a decision unit to rise linearly at a rate r from its initial value s0 until it reaches a fixed threshold theta, when a saccade is initiated. One can regard this decision signal as a neural estimate of the log likelihood of the hypothesis that the target is present, the threshold being the significance criterion or likelihood level at which the target is presumed to be present. Experiments manipulating the prior probability of the target's appearing confirm this notion: the latency distribution then changes in the way expected if s0 simply reflects the prior log likelihood of the stimulus.
视觉目标出现与为注视该目标而开始的眼球快速运动之间的延迟在每次试验中都有所不同,其变化程度用诸如突触延迟和传导速度等普通“生理”过程无法解释。另一种解释是,它代表了决定目标是否实际存在所需的时间:决策过程必然是随机的,因为它们依赖于从有噪声的感觉信号中提取信息。在一个这样的模型中,目标的出现会使决策单元中的信号以速率r从其初始值s0开始线性上升,直到达到固定阈值θ时启动扫视。人们可以将这个决策信号视为目标存在这一假设的对数似然性的神经估计,阈值是假定目标存在的显著性标准或似然水平。操纵目标出现的先验概率的实验证实了这一观点:如果s0仅仅反映了刺激的先验对数似然性,那么延迟分布就会以预期的方式发生变化。