• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疼痛强度描述性差异量表:条目及量表属性评估

The Descriptor Differential Scale of Pain Intensity: an evaluation of item and scale properties.

作者信息

Doctor Jason N, Slater Mark A, Atkinson Hampton J

机构信息

San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, USA University of California, San Diego, CA 9216, USA University of California, San Diego and San Diego State University Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.

出版信息

Pain. 1995 May;61(2):251-260. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00180-M.

DOI:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00180-M
PMID:7659435
Abstract

Improved methods for pain measurement have both theoretical and clinical importance. This study evaluated the Descriptor Differential Scale (DDS) of Pain Intensity, a recent methodology designed for assessing pain reports in clinical samples. Experiment 1 evaluated the sensitivity of the measure to small changes in electrocutaneous stimulation relative to a traditional visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain intensity. Additionally, direct psychophysical scaling methods were employed to determine ratio-scale values for the DDS sensory items in relation to the electrocutaneous stimuli. This ratio scale was cross-validated by comparison with previously published ratio-scaled data from cross-modality matching pain intensity judgement studies. Experiment 2 evaluated the performance of the measure in both experimental and clinical pain samples, as well as the similarity of item-response patterns in each of these samples. Results indicate that the DDS of Pain Intensity is sensitive to small changes in electrocutaneous stimulation, has consistent ratio-scale properties across two different psychophysical methods, and demonstrates similar item-response patterns across divergent experimental and clinical samples. The results support the validity of the sensory DDS as a measure of pain intensity.

摘要

改进的疼痛测量方法具有理论和临床重要性。本研究评估了疼痛强度描述符差异量表(DDS),这是一种最近设计用于评估临床样本中疼痛报告的方法。实验1评估了该测量方法相对于传统疼痛强度视觉模拟量表(VAS)对皮肤电刺激微小变化的敏感性。此外,采用直接心理物理学标度方法来确定DDS感觉项目相对于皮肤电刺激的比率量表值。通过与先前发表的来自跨模态匹配疼痛强度判断研究的比率标度数据进行比较,对该比率量表进行了交叉验证。实验2评估了该测量方法在实验性和临床疼痛样本中的表现,以及每个样本中项目反应模式的相似性。结果表明,疼痛强度DDS对皮肤电刺激的微小变化敏感,在两种不同的心理物理学方法中具有一致的比率量表属性,并且在不同的实验性和临床样本中表现出相似的项目反应模式。这些结果支持了感觉DDS作为疼痛强度测量方法的有效性。

相似文献

1
The Descriptor Differential Scale of Pain Intensity: an evaluation of item and scale properties.疼痛强度描述性差异量表:条目及量表属性评估
Pain. 1995 May;61(2):251-260. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00180-M.
2
Validity and sensitivity of ratio scales of sensory and affective verbal pain descriptors: manipulation of affect by diazepam.
Pain. 1978 Jun;5(1):19-29. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(78)90021-0.
3
The Descriptor Differential Scale: applying psychophysical principles to clinical pain assessment.描述符差异量表:将心理物理学原理应用于临床疼痛评估。
Pain. 1988 Dec;35(3):279-288. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90138-8.
4
A new analogue scale for assessing children's pain: an initial validation study.一种用于评估儿童疼痛的新模拟量表:初步验证研究。
Pain. 1996 Mar;64(3):435-443. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00171-9.
5
The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain.视觉模拟量表作为慢性疼痛和实验性疼痛的比率量表测量方法的验证。
Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4.
6
Reliability and responsiveness of three different pain assessments.三种不同疼痛评估方法的可靠性和反应性
J Rehabil Med. 2001 Nov;33(6):279-83. doi: 10.1080/165019701753236473.
7
Cancer pain intensity measurement: concurrent validity of three tools--finger dynamometer, pain intensity number scale, visual analogue scale.
Hosp J. 1990;6(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/0742-969x.1990.11882662.
8
Reproducibility of pain measurement and pain perception.疼痛测量与疼痛感知的可重复性。
Pain. 2002 Jul;98(1-2):205-16. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00048-9.
9
A pilot assessment of alternative methods of quantifying dental pain with particular reference to dentine hypersensitivity.一项关于量化牙齿疼痛的替代方法的初步评估,特别提及牙本质过敏。
Community Dent Health. 1997 Jun;14(2):92-6.
10
Reliability and validity of verbal descriptor scales of painfulness.疼痛程度言语描述量表的信度和效度。
Pain. 1987 May;29(2):175-185. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91034-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospitalized patients quantify verbal pain intensity descriptors: methodological issues and values for 26 descriptors.住院患者对言语疼痛强度描述符进行量化:26 个描述符的方法学问题和数值。
Pain. 2020 Feb;161(2):281-287. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001716.
2
The Clinical Relevance of Pain Severity Changes: Is There Any Difference Between Asian and Caucasian Patients With Osteoarthritis Pain?疼痛严重程度变化的临床意义:亚洲和高加索骨关节炎疼痛患者之间有区别吗?
Pain Pract. 2020 Feb;20(2):129-137. doi: 10.1111/papr.12835. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
3
Contextual influences in decoding pain expressions: effects of patient age, informational priming, and observer characteristics.
语境对疼痛表情解码的影响:患者年龄、信息启动和观察者特征的影响。
Pain. 2018 Nov;159(11):2363-2374. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001345.
4
2017 HIVMA of IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Chronic Pain in Patients Living With HIV.2017 年美国传染病学会艾滋病毒医学协会慢性 HIV 感染者疼痛管理临床实践指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 30;65(10):e1-e37. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix636.
5
Is low-dose amitriptyline effective in the management of chronic low back pain? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.小剂量阿米替林对慢性下腰痛的治疗是否有效?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2016 Oct 22;17(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1637-1.
6
A randomized controlled trial of gabapentin for chronic low back pain with and without a radiating component.加巴喷丁用于伴有或不伴有放射性成分的慢性下腰痛的随机对照试验。
Pain. 2016 Jul;157(7):1499-1507. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000554.
7
A comparison of implant extrusion rates and postoperative pain after evisceration with immediate or delayed implants and after enucleation with implants.眼球内容剜出术后即刻或延迟植入义眼座以及眼球摘除术后植入义眼座后的义眼座挤出率和术后疼痛比较。
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2005;103:568-91.