Phillips K A, Kim J M, Hudson J I
Body Dysmorphic Disorder Program, Butler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1995 Jun;18(2):317-34.
At this time, the question posed by this article's title--body image disturbance in body dysmorphic disorder and eating disorders: obsessions or delusions?--is probably best answered "both." Both disorders appear to be characterized by obsessional and delusional thinking. In addition, it is likely that their nondelusional and delusional variants constitute a single disorder encompassing a spectrum of insight, with the entire spectrum characterized by obsessional thinking. This view represents a considerable departure from DSM-III-R, in which the psychotic disorders were encapsulated in a separate section of the manual and considered different disorders from their nonpsychotic variants. The one exception was the mood disorders, which were acknowledged to have psychotic variants that were classified in the manual's "nonpsychotic" section. In DSM-IV, on the basis of emerging empirical evidence about the dimensional nature of the psychotic/nonpsychotic boundary, the dichotomy between delusional and nondelusional disorders is less clear. The double coding allowed for BDD acknowledges that BDD and its delusional disorder variant may constitute a single disorder; that allowed for OCD acknowledges that OCD may be delusional. With regard to eating disorders, however, DSM-IV is surprisingly silent, perhaps because delusional preoccupations are less common than in BDD. These issues also may apply to other disorders. Like BDD, hypochondriasis is classified as a somatoform disorder, with its delusional variant a type of delusional disorder, somatic type. Do the delusional and nondelusional variants of hypochondriasis constitute the same disorder? Do other types of somatic delusional disorder, such as parasitosis and olfactory reference syndrome (the belief that one emits a foul body odor) have nondelusional variants? It is likely that a number of disorders span a spectrum from delusional to nondelusional thinking, with unlimited shades of gray in between. Future research may indicate that obsessional disorders such as BDD, anorexia, OCD, and hypochondriasis, as well as other disorders such as major depression, should have qualifiers or subtypes--for example, "with good insight," "with poor insight," and "with delusional (or psychotic) thinking"--with an implied continuum of insight embraced by a single disorder. Such an approach, which scatters psychosis throughout the nomenclature, ultimately may be shown to be a more valid and clinically useful classification approach. Answers to these questions will not only improve our classification system but also may have important treatment implications. For example, the preliminary finding that delusional BDD responds preferentially to SRIs but not to neuroleptic agents contradicts conventional wisdom about the treatment of psychosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
此时,本文标题所提出的问题——躯体变形障碍和进食障碍中的躯体意象障碍:强迫观念还是妄想?——或许最好的答案是“两者皆是”。这两种障碍似乎都以强迫性和妄想性思维为特征。此外,它们的非妄想性和妄想性变体可能构成一种单一的障碍,涵盖一系列自知力情况,整个范围都以强迫性思维为特征。这种观点与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM - III - R)有很大不同,在该版本中,精神障碍被归入手册的一个单独部分,并被认为与其非精神病性变体是不同的障碍。唯一的例外是心境障碍,其被认为有精神病性变体,并被归类在手册的“非精神病性”部分。在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM - IV)中,基于有关精神病性/非精神病性界限的维度性质的新实证证据,妄想性障碍和非妄想性障碍之间的二分法不再那么清晰。对躯体变形障碍的双重编码承认躯体变形障碍及其妄想性障碍变体可能构成一种单一的障碍;对强迫症的双重编码承认强迫症可能是妄想性的。然而,关于进食障碍,DSM - IV令人惊讶地未作说明,可能是因为妄想性先占观念不如在躯体变形障碍中那么常见。这些问题可能也适用于其他障碍。与躯体变形障碍一样,疑病症被归类为躯体形式障碍,其妄想性变体是一种妄想性障碍,躯体型。疑病症的妄想性和非妄想性变体是否构成同一种障碍?其他类型的躯体妄想性障碍,如寄生虫妄想症和嗅觉参照综合征(认为自己散发难闻体味)是否有非妄想性变体?很可能许多障碍跨越从妄想性思维到非妄想性思维的范围,其间有无数种灰色地带。未来的研究可能表明,诸如躯体变形障碍、厌食症、强迫症和疑病症等强迫性障碍,以及其他障碍如重度抑郁症,应该有限定词或亚型——例如,“自知力良好”、“自知力差”和“有妄想性(或精神病性)思维”——暗示由单一障碍涵盖的自知力连续体。这种将精神病性分散在整个命名法中的方法,最终可能被证明是一种更有效且临床上更有用的分类方法。这些问题的答案不仅会改进我们的分类系统,还可能对治疗有重要影响。例如,初步研究发现妄想性躯体变形障碍对选择性5 - 羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SRIs)有优先反应,但对抗精神病药物无反应,这与关于精神病治疗的传统观念相矛盾。(摘要截选至400字)