Suppr超能文献

院外呼吸骤停。

Respiratory arrest outside hospital.

作者信息

Jones S D, Donnelly P D, Bewley J, Weston C F

机构信息

Centre for Applied Public Health, Temple of Peace and Health, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 1995 Apr;29(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(94)00815-w.

Abstract

Of 954 attempted resuscitations outside hospital performed by ambulance personnel, 48 patients (5%) had primary respiratory arrest. Comparing this group with those manifesting cardiorespiratory arrest, patients with primary respiratory arrest were significantly more likely to be female (25 of 48 vs 269 of 906-P < 0.005), were more likely to have a non-cardiac cause (67% vs. 22%-P < 0.00001) and more likely to have witnessed arrest. Of all arrests witnessed by ambulance crew, 35% were respiratory arrests. Basic and advanced life-support was delivered sooner. Outcome was significantly better, with 19 patients (40%) being discharged compared to only 49 patients (5.1%) discharged in cases of cardiorespiratory arrest (p < 0.00001). Considering that many respiratory arrests were witnessed by ambulance crew, the type of crew (EMT or paramedic) made no difference to outcome. Our findings suggest that patients manifesting respiratory arrest outside hospital are a heterogeneous group who have a relatively good prognosis regardless of the type of ambulance crew that attends.

摘要

在救护人员在院外进行的954次复苏尝试中,48名患者(5%)出现原发性呼吸骤停。将该组与表现为心肺骤停的患者进行比较,原发性呼吸骤停患者更有可能为女性(48例中的25例 vs 906例中的269例 - P < 0.005),更有可能有非心脏原因(67% vs. 22% - P < 0.00001),且更有可能是目击骤停。在救护人员目击的所有骤停中,35%为呼吸骤停。基础和高级生命支持的实施更快。结局明显更好,19名患者(40%)出院,而心肺骤停患者中只有49名(5.1%)出院(p < 0.00001)。考虑到许多呼吸骤停是由救护人员目击的,救护人员类型(急救医疗技术员或护理人员)对结局没有影响。我们的研究结果表明,院外出现呼吸骤停的患者是一个异质性群体,无论参与的救护人员类型如何,其预后相对较好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验