Suppr超能文献

全方位的护理技能能否提高院外心脏骤停的存活率?

Can the full range of paramedic skills improve survival from out of hospital cardiac arrests?

作者信息

Mitchell R G, Guly U M, Rainer T H, Robertson C E

机构信息

Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.

出版信息

J Accid Emerg Med. 1997 Sep;14(5):274-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.14.5.274.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of full implementation of advanced skills by ambulance personnel on the outcome from out of hospital cardiac arrest.

SETTING

Patients with cardiac arrest treated at the accident and emergency department of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.

METHODS

All cardiorespiratory arrests occurring in the community were studied over a one year period. For patients arresting before the arrival of an ambulance crew, outcome of 92 patients treated by emergency medical technicians equipped with defibrillators was compared with that of 155 treated by paramedic crews. The proportions of patients whose arrest was witnessed by lay persons and those that had bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were similar in both groups.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the presenting rhythm between the two groups. Eight of the 92 patients (8.7%) treated by technicians survived to discharge compared with eight of 155 (5.2%) treated by paramedics (NS). Of those in ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia, eight of 43 (18.6%) in the technician group and seven of 80 (8.8%) in the paramedic group survived to hospital discharge (NS). For patients arresting in the presence of an ambulance crew, four of 13 patients treated by technicians compared with seven of 15 by paramedics survived to hospital discharge. Only two patients surviving to hospital discharge received drug treatment before the return of spontaneous circulation.

CONCLUSIONS

No improvement in survival was demonstrated with more advanced prehospital care.

摘要

目的

探讨救护人员全面实施高级技能对院外心脏骤停患者预后的影响。

背景

在爱丁堡皇家医院急诊科接受治疗的心脏骤停患者。

方法

对一年内社区发生的所有心肺骤停患者进行研究。对于在救护人员到达之前发生心脏骤停的患者,将配备除颤器的急救医疗技术人员治疗的92例患者的预后与护理人员治疗的155例患者的预后进行比较。两组中由非专业人员目睹心脏骤停的患者比例以及接受旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)的患者比例相似。

结果

两组患者的初始心律无差异。急救医疗技术人员治疗的92例患者中有8例(8.7%)存活出院,而护理人员治疗的155例患者中有8例(5.2%)存活出院(无显著性差异)。在心室颤动或无脉性室性心动过速患者中,急救医疗技术人员组的43例中有8例(18.6%)存活出院,护理人员组的80例中有7例(8.8%)存活出院(无显著性差异)。对于在救护人员在场时发生心脏骤停的患者,急救医疗技术人员治疗的13例患者中有4例存活出院,而护理人员治疗的15例患者中有7例存活出院。只有2例存活出院的患者在自主循环恢复前接受了药物治疗。

结论

更高级的院前护理并未显示出存活率的提高。

相似文献

1
Can the full range of paramedic skills improve survival from out of hospital cardiac arrests?
J Accid Emerg Med. 1997 Sep;14(5):274-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.14.5.274.
2
Paramedics, technicians, and survival from out of hospital cardiac arrest.
J Accid Emerg Med. 1997 Sep;14(5):278-82. doi: 10.1136/emj.14.5.278.
3
Paramedics and technicians are equally successful at managing cardiac arrest outside hospital.
BMJ. 1995 Apr 29;310(6987):1091-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6987.1091.
5
6
Advanced rescuer- versus citizen-witnessed cardiac arrest: Is there a difference in outcome?
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Jan-Mar;15(1):55-60. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.514089. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
7
Improved patient survival using a modified resuscitation protocol for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Circulation. 2009 May 19;119(19):2597-605. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.815621. Epub 2009 May 4.
8
Effect of emergency medical technician-placed Combitubes on outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):495-9. doi: 10.1080/10903120903144874.
9
Survival in the elderly after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Crit Care Med. 1993 Nov;21(11):1645-51. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199311000-00012.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验