Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜腹会阴直肠切除术

Laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.

作者信息

Darzi A, Lewis C, Menzies-Gow N, Guillou P J, Monson J R

机构信息

Academic Surgical Unit, St. Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1995 Apr;9(4):414-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00187163.

Abstract

In laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection of the rectum (LAP-AP) an abdominal incision is completely avoided as the tumor is delivered through the perineal incision. It is our belief that the view provided in the pelvis by laparoscopy is significantly better than at laparotomy and allows excellent anatomical definition and meticulous dissection. In this study we compared the adequacy of excision of the first 12 patients undergoing LAP-AP to the last 16 patients undergoing open abdominoperineal resection (OP-AP). In all patients the procedure was carried with curative intent for adenocarcinoma and the Dukes staging and Jass score's were similar in both groups. [table: see text] The data demonstrate similar nodal harvest in both groups as well as extent of radial excision. However, two patients in the open group had microscopic radial margin involvement despite being microscopically clear at surgery. We conclude that although long-term follow-up is required to address the issue of local cancer recurrence, laparoscopic rectal dissection appears as good as open surgery and may allow a more precise assessment of excision margins.

摘要

在腹腔镜经腹会阴直肠切除术(LAP - AP)中,由于肿瘤是通过会阴切口取出的,所以完全避免了腹部切口。我们认为,腹腔镜检查在盆腔提供的视野明显优于开腹手术,能够实现出色的解剖定位和精细的解剖操作。在本研究中,我们将接受LAP - AP手术的前12例患者与接受开放性经腹会阴切除术(OP - AP)的后16例患者的切除充分性进行了比较。所有患者均因腺癌接受了具有治愈意图的手术,两组患者的Dukes分期和Jass评分相似。[表格:见正文]数据表明两组的淋巴结清扫数量以及径向切除范围相似。然而,开放手术组中有两名患者尽管手术时显微镜下切缘清晰,但仍有显微镜下的径向切缘受累。我们得出结论,尽管需要长期随访来解决局部癌症复发问题,但腹腔镜直肠解剖似乎与开放手术效果相当,并且可能允许对切缘进行更精确的评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验