Suppr超能文献

[手术分流仍有必要吗?]

[Are surgical shunts still indicated?].

作者信息

Otto G

机构信息

Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg.

出版信息

Chirurg. 1995 Jun;66(6):566-73.

PMID:7664585
Abstract

The indication for portosystemic shunts has been influenced by endoscopic approaches, liver transplantation and TIPSS. Underlying disease and functional capacity of the liver are crucial for the therapeutic strategy in patients with esophageal variceal hemorrhage. In Child B and C cirrhosis results of liver transplantation are superior to surgical shunts. In transplantation candidates shunt surgery should not interfere with the transplantation procedure. Therefore, TIPSS, mesocaval shunt or Warren shunt are recommended. If transplantation is not indicated, surgical shunts are generally justified for intractable variceal bleeding. Due to the high mortality following surgical shunts TIPSS may be preferentially used in patients with Child C cirrhosis.

摘要

门体分流术的适应证受到内镜治疗、肝移植和经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPSS)的影响。潜在疾病和肝脏功能对于食管静脉曲张出血患者的治疗策略至关重要。在Child B级和C级肝硬化患者中,肝移植的效果优于外科分流术。对于适合肝移植的患者,分流手术不应干扰移植手术。因此,推荐采用TIPSS、肠系膜上静脉-腔静脉分流术或沃伦分流术。如果不适合进行肝移植,外科分流术通常可用于治疗难治性静脉曲张出血。由于外科分流术后死亡率较高,TIPSS可能更适合Child C级肝硬化患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验