Bain B J
Department of Haematology, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, London.
J Clin Pathol. 1995 Jun;48(6):501-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.6.501.
The relative importance of traditional techniques used in the diagnosis of haematological neoplasms has altered during the past decade. Cytology and histology retain their central role but the importance of cytochemistry has declined, except in the diagnosis of AML. Immunophenotyping is of major importance in the diagnosis of ALL, some categories of AML and the LPDs. Cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis are important in the diagnosis of CML and are becoming increasingly important in the diagnosis of chronic LPDs and other haematological neoplasms. Diagnostic haematology laboratories which are not specialist leukaemia centres should have ready access to all of these techniques to ensure optimal patient management. However, not all techniques need to be performed in every laboratory.
在过去十年中,用于血液系统肿瘤诊断的传统技术的相对重要性已经发生了变化。细胞学和组织学仍然发挥着核心作用,但细胞化学的重要性已经下降,急性髓系白血病(AML)的诊断除外。免疫表型分析在急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)、某些类型的AML以及淋巴增殖性疾病(LPDs)的诊断中至关重要。细胞遗传学和分子遗传学分析在慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)的诊断中很重要,并且在慢性LPDs和其他血液系统肿瘤的诊断中变得越来越重要。非专科白血病中心的诊断血液学实验室应能够随时使用所有这些技术,以确保对患者进行最佳管理。然而,并非所有技术都需要在每个实验室中进行。