• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets.

作者信息

Keizer S, ten Cate J M, Arends J

出版信息

Am J Orthod. 1976 Mar;69(3):318-27. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(76)90079-8.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9416(76)90079-8
PMID:766645
Abstract

The direct adhesive bonding of orthodontic brackets to enamel was investigated. For a number of resin systems, all based on a bisphenol-GMA type of resin, commercially available or synthesized, the adhesive bonding to the enamel as well as to the bracket was studied. The maximum average bond strength to enamel was 121 Kg. per square centimeter; the maximum adhesion to the bracket material was 53 Kg. per square centimeter. Consequently, the attachment of the adhesive to the bracket material is the bottleneck of the direct-bonding procedure. Special attention has been given to preconditioning procedures to enhance the bonding between adhesive and bracket. The best results were obtained when the bracket base was roughened by means of a small amount of resin powder. Because all adhesives studied show large standard deviations of the bond strength, criteria of reliability are discussed. They show that future approaches should aim not only for higher average bonds strengths but also for a smaller standard deviation. The setting process, one of the factors influencing reliability, has been considered in some detail. Results of different mixing ratios as well as the influence of the amount of catalyst are presented.

摘要

相似文献

1
Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets.
Am J Orthod. 1976 Mar;69(3):318-27. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(76)90079-8.
2
Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.不同托槽粘结系统与牛牙釉质粘结强度的评估。
Eur J Orthod. 1997 Jun;19(3):259-70. doi: 10.1093/ejo/19.3.259.
3
Use of an adhesive resin for bonding orthodontic brackets.用于粘结正畸托槽的粘结树脂的使用。
Eur J Orthod. 1994 Feb;16(1):27-34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/16.1.27.
4
Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives.不同托槽类型和黏合剂直接与间接黏接的临床比较
Am J Orthod. 1978 Jul;74(1):62-78. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90046-5.
5
Light cured direct bonding--is it necessary to use a primer?
Eur J Orthod. 1991 Feb;13(1):22-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/13.1.22.
6
Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.改变粘结方案对金属和陶瓷正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Gen Dent. 2012 Jan-Feb;60(1):51-5.
7
Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel.陶瓷正畸托槽与牙釉质的剪切粘结强度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Oct;98(4):348-53. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81492-1.
8
Torsional bond strength and failure pattern of ceramic brackets bonded to composite resin laminate veneers.陶瓷托槽与复合树脂贴面粘结的扭转粘结强度及失败模式
Eur J Orthod. 1995 Dec;17(6):533-40. doi: 10.1093/ejo/17.6.533.
9
Optimization of a procedure for rebonding dislodged orthodontic brackets.重新粘结脱位正畸托槽操作流程的优化
Angle Orthod. 1999 Jun;69(3):276-81. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0276:OOAPFR>2.3.CO;2.
10
Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.两种传统树脂黏合剂与一种树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀之间托槽脱黏力的比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Oct;69(5):463-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0463:COBDFB>2.3.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Metal Bracket Bonded with the Conventional Adhesive System and Moisture Insensitive Primer System on a Tooth Surface Which has Undergone Bleaching with 35% Hydrogen Peroxide - An Study.在经过35%过氧化氢漂白的牙齿表面,对用传统粘结剂系统和防潮底漆系统粘结的正畸金属托槽的剪切粘结强度进行比较评估——一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 5):S4613-S4617. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_963_24. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
2
Scanning electron microscopy analysis of metallic and aesthetic bracket meshes before and after debonding.金属及美观托槽网在脱粘前后的扫描电子显微镜分析。
Korean J Orthod. 2025 Jan 25;55(1):15-25. doi: 10.4041/kjod24.073. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
3
Evaluation of the Curing of the Primer on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An Original Research.
评估正畸托槽底漆固化对剪切粘结强度的影响:一项原创研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S180-S182. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_446_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Evaluation of bond strength of orthodontic brackets using light- and chemical-cure adhesive systems over time: An study.使用光固化和化学固化粘结系统对正畸托槽粘结强度随时间的评估:一项研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2023 Mar 18;12:6. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_31_22. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparison of shear bond strength of bonded stainless steel brackets using three different light curing systems: An study.使用三种不同光固化系统的粘结不锈钢托槽剪切粘结强度的比较:一项研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2023 Mar 18;12:20. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_83_22. eCollection 2023.
6
Orthodontic Bonding: Review of the Literature.正畸粘结:文献综述
Int J Dent. 2020 Jul 14;2020:8874909. doi: 10.1155/2020/8874909. eCollection 2020.
7
The association between patient's compliance and age with the bonding failure of orthodontic brackets: a cross-sectional study.患者依从性与年龄对正畸托槽黏结失败的关系:一项横断面研究。
Prog Orthod. 2018 May 1;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0209-1.
8
Bond strength and interfacial morphology of orthodontic brackets bonded to eroded enamel treated with calcium silicate-sodium phosphate salts or resin infiltration.用硅酸钙-磷酸钠盐或树脂渗透处理的侵蚀釉质上粘结的正畸托槽的粘结强度和界面形态
Angle Orthod. 2016 Nov;86(6):909-916. doi: 10.2319/111315-764.1. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
9
Effect of lactic Acid etching on bonding effectiveness of orthodontic bracket after water storage.乳酸蚀刻对正畸托槽储水后粘结效果的影响。
ISRN Dent. 2014 Mar 17;2014:719608. doi: 10.1155/2014/719608. eCollection 2014.
10
Ultrashort pulsed laser conditioning of human enamel: in vitro study of the influence of geometrical processing parameters on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.人牙釉质的超短脉冲激光处理:几何加工参数对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度影响的体外研究
Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Feb;30(2):891-900. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1491-2. Epub 2013 Nov 19.