Suppr超能文献

精神错乱与通奸:一起离婚案件的法医鉴定意义

Insanity and adultery: forensic implications of a divorce case.

作者信息

McKee G R

机构信息

Department of Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Science, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 1995 Apr;76(2):427-34. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.427.

Abstract

Legal responsibility for acts presumes that a person's behavior is rationally intentional and under voluntary control. Automatism, a type of insanity defense, contends that the person's conscious, voluntary control of behavior has been impaired by a mental disorder. In a recent case in South Carolina, automatism was offered as a defense to adultery, an at-fault grounds to divorce. On appeal, the State Supreme Court recognized the novel application of mental impairment defenses in domestic litigation and remanded the case for rehearing. Implications of the ruling for clinical and forensic practice in family court are discussed.

摘要

行为的法律责任假定一个人的行为是理性故意且受自愿控制的。自动症作为一种精神错乱抗辩理由,主张人的行为的有意识、自愿控制因精神障碍而受损。在南卡罗来纳州最近的一个案件中,自动症被用作通奸的抗辩理由,通奸是一种可导致离婚的过错理由。在上诉时,州最高法院认可了精神损害抗辩在家庭诉讼中的新应用,并将案件发回重审。本文讨论了该裁决对家庭法庭临床和法医实践的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验