McKee G R
Department of Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Science, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, USA.
Psychol Rep. 1995 Apr;76(2):427-34. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.427.
Legal responsibility for acts presumes that a person's behavior is rationally intentional and under voluntary control. Automatism, a type of insanity defense, contends that the person's conscious, voluntary control of behavior has been impaired by a mental disorder. In a recent case in South Carolina, automatism was offered as a defense to adultery, an at-fault grounds to divorce. On appeal, the State Supreme Court recognized the novel application of mental impairment defenses in domestic litigation and remanded the case for rehearing. Implications of the ruling for clinical and forensic practice in family court are discussed.
行为的法律责任假定一个人的行为是理性故意且受自愿控制的。自动症作为一种精神错乱抗辩理由,主张人的行为的有意识、自愿控制因精神障碍而受损。在南卡罗来纳州最近的一个案件中,自动症被用作通奸的抗辩理由,通奸是一种可导致离婚的过错理由。在上诉时,州最高法院认可了精神损害抗辩在家庭诉讼中的新应用,并将案件发回重审。本文讨论了该裁决对家庭法庭临床和法医实践的影响。