Schreiber H L
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Juristische Fakultät.
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Nov;90(7):626-30; discussion 631.
The subjects of psychiatric assessments do vary greatly. The main subject of criminal proceedings seems to be that of criminal responsibility. This leads to many misunderstandings. Court and expert have to use the same definitions. Criminal responsibility cannot be the deterministically interpreted freedom of will. The prevailing law does only answer insufficiently the question of selection or consultation of further experts.
精神病评估的对象差异很大。刑事诉讼的主要对象似乎是刑事责任。这导致了许多误解。法庭和专家必须使用相同的定义。刑事责任不能被确定性地解释为意志自由。现行法律对进一步专家的选择或咨询问题回答得并不充分。
