Pasanen P, Eskelinen M, Kulju A, Penttilä I, Janatuinen E, Alhava E
Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1995 Apr;55(2):119-24. doi: 10.3109/00365519509089603.
A prospective study of 62 patients with colorectal cancer was carried out to evaluate the value of tumour-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) in the diagnosis and staging of this disease. The reference group consisted of 97 patients with benign gastrointestinal disease. Increased serum TATI levels were detected in 46 patients with colorectal cancer (sensitivity 74%), and the highest mean values were measured in the patients with stage II cancer. The frequency of elevated values was not affected by the stage of the disease, however. There were altogether 64 false positives (specificity 34%). In comparison to CEA and CA 242, TATI showed higher sensitivity at low (< 40%) specificity levels, but it was less sensitive at high (70-95%) specificity levels. The performance of the CA 50 test was poorest both at high and low specificity levels. The various combinations of TATI and other markers (two tests positive) did not offer any further advantage as compared to CEA alone. A marginally significant positive correlation (p = 0.07) was found between serum TATI and CEA values in colorectal cancer patients. The results suggest that TATI is a very sensitive marker in colorectal cancer, but its utility is limited because of its low specificity in symptomatic patients. Concomitant measurement of TATI and other markers does not seem to give any further benefit, and nor does TATI seem to have any significant value in staging of the disease. Our results also indicate that CEA is probably the best current test in colorectal cancer.
对62例结直肠癌患者进行了一项前瞻性研究,以评估肿瘤相关胰蛋白酶抑制剂(TATI)在该疾病诊断和分期中的价值。参照组由97例良性胃肠道疾病患者组成。46例结直肠癌患者检测到血清TATI水平升高(敏感性74%),II期癌症患者的平均水平最高。然而,升高值的频率不受疾病分期的影响。共有64例假阳性(特异性34%)。与癌胚抗原(CEA)和糖类抗原242(CA 242)相比,TATI在低特异性水平(<40%)时显示出更高的敏感性,但在高特异性水平(70 - 95%)时敏感性较低。CA 50检测在高特异性和低特异性水平时表现最差。与单独使用CEA相比,TATI与其他标志物的各种组合(两项检测呈阳性)并未提供任何进一步的优势。在结直肠癌患者中,血清TATI与CEA值之间发现了微弱的显著正相关(p = 0.07)。结果表明,TATI在结直肠癌中是一个非常敏感的标志物,但由于其在有症状患者中的低特异性,其效用有限。同时检测TATI和其他标志物似乎没有任何进一步的益处,而且TATI在疾病分期中似乎也没有任何显著价值。我们的结果还表明,CEA可能是目前结直肠癌检测中最好的方法。