Suppr超能文献

用于测量心内压力的基于解剖学和生理学的参考水平。

Anatomically and physiologically based reference level for measurement of intracardiac pressures.

作者信息

Courtois M, Fattal P G, Kovács S J, Tiefenbrunn A J, Ludbrook P A

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo 63110, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 1995 Oct 1;92(7):1994-2000. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.7.1994.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many reference levels have been proposed for the measurement of intracardiac pressures, but none have met with universal acceptance. In the first part of our study, we evaluated 10 cardiologists' understanding of how hydrostatic pressure influences intracardiac pressures as measured with fluid-filled catheters. In the second part, we proposed and validated a new zero level (H): the uppermost blood level in the left ventricular (LV) chamber relative to the anterior chest wall for a patient in the supine position. A comparison was made of LV minimum diastolic pressure measured by reference to H versus measurements made with the zero level at midchest.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using two-dimensional echocardiography, we determined H in the LVs of seven normal patients (five male, two female; age, 49 +/- 9 years) undergoing routine cardiac catheterization. H was determined from a left parasternal short-axis view and calculated as the average distance between end diastole and end systole of the endocardium of the uppermost segment of the LV anterior wall below the fourth or fifth intercostal space of the left sternal border on the anterior surface of the chest wall, with the patient in the supine position. A micromanometer/fluid-filled lumen catheter was then positioned in the LV, and we compared the micromanometer LV minimum pressure (LVPmin) obtained when the reference fluid-filled transducer was aligned at midchest with the LVPmin obtained when the reference fluid-filled transducer was aligned at H. LVPmin referenced to a midchest fluid-filled external transducer was measured as 5.1 +/- 1.6 mm Hg (range, 2.4 to 7.2 mm Hg) versus -0.6 +/- 0.6 mm Hg (range, -1.6 to 0.4 mm Hg) when referenced to H (P < .001). A significant linear relation was found to exist between patient anterior-posterior chest diameter and the magnitude of hydrostatic pressure influences related to pressure referenced at midchest (r = .88; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

External fluid-filled transducers should be used with the goal of removing hydrostatic pressure and other influences so that the presence of subatmospheric pressure during diastole in any of the cardiac chambers is accurately measured. To achieve this goal, intracardiac pressure should be referenced to an external fluid-filled transducer aligned with the uppermost blood level in the chamber in which pressure is to be measured. The current practice of referencing the zero level of LV diastolic pressure to an external fluid-filled transducer positioned at the midchest level results in systematic overestimation due to hydrostatic effects and produces physiologically significant error in the measurement of diastolic intracardiac pressure.

摘要

背景

已经提出了许多用于测量心内压力的参考水平,但没有一个得到普遍认可。在我们研究的第一部分,我们评估了10位心脏病专家对流体填充导管测量的心内压力时静水压力如何影响心内压力的理解。在第二部分,我们提出并验证了一个新的零水平(H):仰卧位患者左心室(LV)腔相对于前胸壁的最高血液水平。比较了参照H测量的左心室最小舒张压与在胸部中部零水平测量的结果。

方法和结果

使用二维超声心动图,我们确定了7名接受常规心导管检查的正常患者(5名男性,2名女性;年龄49±9岁)左心室的H。H是从左胸骨旁短轴视图确定的,并计算为仰卧位患者胸壁前表面左胸骨缘第四或第五肋间以下左心室前壁最上段心内膜舒张末期和收缩末期之间的平均距离。然后将微压力计/流体填充腔导管置于左心室中,我们比较了参考流体填充换能器对准胸部中部时获得的微压力计左心室最小压力(LVPmin)与参考流体填充换能器对准H时获得的LVPmin。参照胸部中部流体填充外部换能器测量的LVPmin为5.1±1.6 mmHg(范围2.4至7.2 mmHg),而参照H时为-0.6±0.6 mmHg(范围-1.6至0.4 mmHg)(P<.001)。发现患者前后胸径与与胸部中部参考压力相关的静水压力影响大小之间存在显著线性关系(r=.88;P<.01)。

结论

应使用外部流体填充换能器,目的是消除静水压力和其他影响,以便准确测量任何心腔内舒张期低于大气压的压力。为实现这一目标,心内压力应参照与要测量压力的心腔内最高血液水平对齐的外部流体填充换能器。目前将左心室舒张压零水平参照置于胸部中部水平的外部流体填充换能器的做法,由于静水效应导致系统性高估,并在舒张期心内压力测量中产生生理上显著的误差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验