Suppr超能文献

[肾外伤如何治疗?基于一种新分类法对目前治疗报告的批判性评估]

[What treatment in kidney trauma? A critical evaluation treatment reports up to now based on a new classification].

作者信息

Lent V

机构信息

Abteilung für Urologie, St. Nikolaus-Stiftshospital, Andernach-Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, Universität Bonn.

出版信息

Chirurg. 1995 Jul;66(7):708-14.

PMID:7671758
Abstract

The objective of treatment in renal injuries is to save the life of the traumatized patient, to maintain the function of the affected kidney(s) and to avoid later complications with their sequelae. It has not by any means been established what therapeutic measures (conservative or surgical) are appropriate to obtain the best results in certain traumas, e.g. penetrating injuries, 'moderately severe' parenchymal ruptures or obstructive vascular lesions, since 'conservative' does not automatically entail that there is no operation, and no operation does not automatically mean 'conservative'. According to my own analysis of treatment reports published up to now, inadequate classifications play a major role amongst the multivarious reasons for this. The results and complications are based on such heterogeneous criteria that valid comparisons are not possible. More differentiated measures with modern interventional and surgical techniques appropriate to each individual case can be used for a treatment enabling maximal preservation of the kidneys and which is as free of complications as possible. However, this presupposes a differentiated classification which takes all the relevant factors of renal trauma into consideration. Such a classification of the pathogenesis, location, extent and symptoms as prognostic factors is presented in a suggestion of my own in a gradual differentiation and a simple trauma formula. This enables therapies to be compared, and facilitates clinical decision-making, thereby improving the results of renal trauma treatment.

摘要

肾损伤治疗的目标是挽救创伤患者的生命,维持患肾的功能,并避免后期并发症及其后遗症。对于某些创伤,如穿透伤、“中度严重”的实质破裂或阻塞性血管病变,究竟何种治疗措施(保守或手术)能取得最佳效果,目前尚无定论,因为“保守”并不必然意味着无需手术,而未进行手术也不必然意味着“保守”。根据我对目前已发表的治疗报告的分析,在造成这种情况的诸多原因中,分类不充分起着主要作用。结果和并发症基于如此不同的标准,以至于无法进行有效的比较。针对每个具体病例,采用更具针对性的现代介入和手术技术,可以采取更有区分度的措施进行治疗,从而最大程度地保留肾脏,并尽可能减少并发症。然而,这需要一个考虑到肾创伤所有相关因素的区分度高的分类方法。我本人提出了一种建议,将发病机制、位置、程度和症状作为预后因素进行逐步区分,并给出一个简单的创伤公式。这使得各种治疗方法能够进行比较,便于临床决策,从而提高肾损伤的治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验