Smart R G
Int J Addict. 1976;11(1):143-59. doi: 10.3109/10826087109045536.
This paper reviews the outcomes of follow-up studies of addicts in therapeutic communities. The aim is to assess the research problems in such studies and the range of recovery rates found. It was found that controlled studies are few in number and available only for correctional institutions, not for Daytop, Synanon, or Phoenix House. Most studies base outcomes on "graduates" rather than all those taken into the program. Very few graduates of traditional communities exist. Most are employed in drug or social service activities. Few return to employment outside treatment agencies for addicts. Three controlled studies, all with halfway houses, suggest that they are not more effective than probation. Further controlled studies, especially with agencies such as Daytop and Synanon, are required.
本文回顾了治疗社区中成瘾者的后续研究结果。目的是评估此类研究中的研究问题以及所发现的康复率范围。结果发现,对照研究数量很少,且仅适用于惩教机构,不适用于戴托普、锡纳农或凤凰屋。大多数研究将结果基于“毕业生”而非所有参与该项目的人。传统社区的毕业生很少。大多数人受雇于毒品或社会服务活动。很少有人在戒毒治疗机构之外恢复工作。三项对照研究,均涉及中途之家,表明它们并不比缓刑更有效。需要进一步进行对照研究,尤其是针对戴托普和锡纳农等机构。