Butler J C, Ryckman R M, Thornton B, Bouchard R L
Department of Psychology, University of Maine.
J Soc Psychol. 1993 Apr;133(2):147-62. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1993.9712133.
A major limitation of physique stereotyping research is that American subjects have used a restricted set of traits provided by the experimenter to evaluate endomorphs, mesomorphs, and ectomorphs. A free-response procedure was used in Study 1 to identify the full domain of traits associated with each physique. Although many of the traits identified were similar to those used in previous research, a number of new trait dimensions were uncovered. In Study 2, the large number of traits generated with the free-response format was reduced by combining synonyms. This new set of traits was placed in semantic differential format and given to a new sample of subjects to evaluate. The results paralleled those of the first study with the exception that ectomorphs were seen more favorably. This discrepancy, as well as the fact that raters listed trait antonyms within each of the three major physiques in Study 1, suggests the possibility of unique subtypes within the global stereotypes. Examples of these subtypes are proposed.
体格刻板印象研究的一个主要局限在于,美国受试者使用的是实验者提供的一组有限特质来评估内胚型、中胚型和外胚型体型。研究1采用自由反应程序来确定与每种体型相关的全部特质领域。尽管所确定的许多特质与先前研究中使用的特质相似,但也发现了一些新的特质维度。在研究2中,通过合并同义词减少了自由反应格式产生的大量特质。这组新特质被制成语义差异格式,并交给新的受试者样本进行评估。结果与第一项研究相似,只是外胚型体型被评价得更积极。这种差异,以及评分者在研究1中列出了三种主要体型各自的特质反义词这一事实,表明在整体刻板印象中可能存在独特的子类型。文中提出了这些子类型的示例。