Mathew R J, Mathew V G, Wilson W H, Georgi J M
Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
J Stud Alcohol. 1995 Jul;56(4):470-5. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1995.56.470.
A modified version of an instrument called the Mathew Materialism-Spiritualism Scale (MMSS), originally developed in India, was evaluated for possible use in substance abuse research in the U.S.
The scale was administered to 62 individuals recovering from substance use, 20 clergy people and 61 general controls.
Test-retest reliability for the MMSS was verified by administering it to 18 control subjects on two separate occasions, 7 days apart. The Pearson correlation for the MMSS total scores was 0.83 (p < .0001). Internal consistency was examined with Cronbach's alpha in the entire sample of 143 subjects; the result for the total score was .93. Factor analysis showed a factor structure compatible with the subscales proposed by the developer. Women, in general, obtained higher spirituality scores. Members of the recovering group obtained significantly higher scores on "character" and "mysticism" than the general controls. When general controls were divided into MAST positive and MAST negative individuals, the MAST positive group obtained lower scores than the recovering group for "God," "mysticism" and "character." MAST negative individuals had lower scores on "mysticism" than the recovering group. Christians had higher scores on "God" and "religion" subscales than did nonChristians and agnostics.
The results of this study need confirmation using an improved methodology and larger sample sizes. However, they suggest that the scale may be useful for the study of spirituality in the U.S.
对一种名为马修物质主义 - 精神主义量表(MMSS)的工具的改良版本进行评估,该量表最初在印度开发,探讨其在美国药物滥用研究中的潜在用途。
该量表被施用于62名从药物使用中康复的个体、20名神职人员和61名普通对照者。
通过在两个不同时间(间隔7天)对18名对照受试者施用MMSS,验证了其重测信度。MMSS总分的皮尔逊相关系数为0.83(p < .0001)。在143名受试者的整个样本中用克朗巴哈系数检验内部一致性;总分结果为.93。因子分析显示的因子结构与开发者提出的子量表兼容。总体而言,女性获得更高的精神性得分。康复组成员在“品格”和“神秘主义”方面的得分显著高于普通对照者。当将普通对照者分为MAST阳性和MAST阴性个体时,MAST阳性组在“上帝”“神秘主义”和“品格”方面的得分低于康复组。MAST阴性个体在“神秘主义”方面的得分低于康复组。基督徒在“上帝”和“宗教”子量表上的得分高于非基督徒和不可知论者。
本研究结果需要使用改进的方法和更大样本量进行验证。然而,这些结果表明该量表可能在美国精神性研究中有用。