• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应激对吗啡诱导的镇痛作用增强的大鼠品系差异。

Rat strain differences in the potentiation of morphine-induced analgesia by stress.

作者信息

Woolfolk D R, Holtzman S G

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1995 Aug;51(4):699-703. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(94)00440-t.

DOI:10.1016/0091-3057(94)00440-t
PMID:7675846
Abstract

Restraint stress has been shown to increase the magnitude and duration of morphine-induced analgesia; however, this phenomenon has only been investigated using the Sprague-Dawley rat strain. The purpose of this study was to determine if other rat strains would also exhibit a potentiated analgesic response to morphine compared to their unrestrained controls. Dose-response and time course curves for the analgesic effect of morphine (1.0, 3.0, 5.6, 10 mg/kg) were generated in adult, male Wistar, Lewis, Fischer 344, Long-Evans Hooded, and Sprague-Dawley rats either unrestrained or restrained in Plexiglas cylinders, using the tail flick assay. Morphine produced dose-dependent increases in tail flick latencies, and this effect was potentiated by restraint stress in the Sprague-Dawley, Wistar, Lewis, and Fischer 344 strains, but not in the Long-Evans Hooded rats. Because Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats displayed the most robust stress effect, the use of either of these rat strains is appropriate in studying the mechanisms of stress-induced potentiation of analgesia. The differences among rat strains demonstrated in this study may serve as a basis for correlation with opioid function.

摘要

应激束缚已被证明会增加吗啡诱导的镇痛效果的强度和持续时间;然而,这一现象仅在斯普拉格-道利大鼠品系中进行过研究。本研究的目的是确定与未受束缚的对照组相比,其他大鼠品系是否也会对吗啡表现出增强的镇痛反应。使用甩尾试验,在成年雄性Wistar大鼠、Lewis大鼠、Fischer 344大鼠、长-伊文斯有帽大鼠和斯普拉格-道利大鼠中,生成了吗啡(1.0、3.0、5.6、10 mg/kg)镇痛作用的剂量-反应曲线和时间进程曲线,这些大鼠要么未受束缚,要么被束缚在有机玻璃圆筒中。吗啡使甩尾潜伏期呈剂量依赖性增加,在斯普拉格-道利大鼠、Wistar大鼠、Lewis大鼠和Fischer 344大鼠品系中,这种作用因应激束缚而增强,但在长-伊文斯有帽大鼠中未增强。由于斯普拉格-道利大鼠和Wistar大鼠表现出最强的应激效应,在研究应激诱导的镇痛增强机制时,使用这两种大鼠品系中的任何一种都是合适的。本研究中大鼠品系之间的差异可作为与阿片类药物功能相关性研究的基础。

相似文献

1
Rat strain differences in the potentiation of morphine-induced analgesia by stress.应激对吗啡诱导的镇痛作用增强的大鼠品系差异。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1995 Aug;51(4):699-703. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(94)00440-t.
2
Stress-induced potentiation of morphine-induced analgesia in morphine-tolerant rats.应激诱导的吗啡耐受大鼠中吗啡镇痛作用的增强
Neuropharmacology. 1989 Jun;28(6):563-7. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(89)90134-2.
3
Restraint stress potentiates analgesia induced by 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine: comparison with morphine.束缚应激增强5'-N-乙基羧酰胺腺苷诱导的镇痛作用:与吗啡的比较。
Eur J Pharmacol. 1993 Aug 3;239(1-3):177-82. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(93)90991-p.
4
Factors affecting restraint stress-induced potentiation of morphine analgesia.影响束缚应激诱导的吗啡镇痛增强作用的因素。
Brain Res. 1990 Dec 24;537(1-2):157-62. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90352-c.
5
Potentiation of morphine analgesia in rats given a single exposure to restraint stress immobilization.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1992 Feb;41(2):449-53. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(92)90125-y.
6
Delta opioid antagonist, naltrindole, selectively blocks analgesia induced by DPDPE but not DAGO or morphine.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991 Jan;38(1):185-90. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(91)90608-5.
7
Sex differences in (-)-pentazocine antinociception: comparison to morphine and spiradoline in four rat strains using a thermal nociceptive assay.(-)-喷他佐辛镇痛作用的性别差异:使用热痛觉测定法在四种大鼠品系中与吗啡和螺旋哌丁苯的比较
Behav Pharmacol. 2003 Feb;14(1):77-85. doi: 10.1097/00008877-200302000-00008.
8
Lewis and Fischer rat strains display differences in biochemical, electrophysiological and behavioral parameters: studies in the nucleus accumbens and locus coeruleus of drug naive and morphine-treated animals.刘易斯大鼠和费舍尔大鼠品系在生化、电生理及行为参数方面存在差异:对未接触过药物及经吗啡处理的动物伏隔核和蓝斑的研究。
Brain Res. 1993 May 14;611(1):7-17. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91770-s.
9
The effects of light cycle phase on morphine-induced conditioned taste aversions in the Lewis, Fischer and Sprague-Dawley rat strains.光周期阶段对Lewis、Fischer和Sprague-Dawley大鼠品系中吗啡诱导的条件性味觉厌恶的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jan 3;196(1):116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.07.023. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
10
Effects of stress modulation on morphine-induced conditioned place preferences and plasma corticosterone levels in Fischer, Lewis, and Sprague-Dawley rat strains.应激调节对费希尔、刘易斯和斯普拉格-道利大鼠品系中吗啡诱导的条件性位置偏爱及血浆皮质酮水平的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Dec;189(3):277-86. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0562-5. Epub 2006 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Heroin- and Fentanyl-Induced Respiratory Depression in a Rat Plethysmography Model: Potency, Tolerance, and Sex Differences.在大鼠胸廓容积描记模型中观察到海洛因和芬太尼引起的呼吸抑制:效价、耐受性和性别差异。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2023 May;385(2):117-134. doi: 10.1124/jpet.122.001476. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
2
The analgesic efficacy of morphine varies with rat strain and experimental pain model: implications for target validation efforts in pain drug discovery.吗啡的镇痛效果因大鼠品系和实验性疼痛模型而异:对疼痛药物发现中目标验证工作的启示。
Eur J Pain. 2019 Mar;23(3):539-554. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1327. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
3
Impact of strain, sex, and estrous cycle on gamma butyrolactone-evoked absence seizures in rats.
品系、性别和动情周期对大鼠γ-丁内酯诱发失神发作的影响。
Epilepsy Res. 2018 Nov;147:62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
4
Entanglement between thermoregulation and nociception in the rat: the case of morphine.大鼠体温调节与痛觉感受之间的相互关联:以吗啡为例。
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Dec 1;116(6):2473-2496. doi: 10.1152/jn.00482.2016. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
5
Mu opioids and their receptors: evolution of a concept.μ 阿片类药物及其受体:概念的演变。
Pharmacol Rev. 2013 Sep 27;65(4):1257-317. doi: 10.1124/pr.112.007138. Print 2013.
6
The genetic mediation of individual differences in sensitivity to pain and its inhibition.疼痛敏感性及其抑制方面个体差异的遗传介导作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jul 6;96(14):7744-51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.7744.