Hatton C, Knussen C, Sloper P, Turner S
Hester Adrian Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Glasgow.
Psychol Med. 1995 Mar;25(2):419-22. doi: 10.1017/s003329170003631x.
The stability of the Ways of Coping (Revised) Questionnaire over time was assessed by comparing the scores of 68 mothers and 53 fathers of school-aged children with Down's syndrome over a 3-year time interval on the five coping strategy subscales described by Knussen et al. (1992). For this analysis, mothers' and fathers' scores were analysed separately. It was shown by t tests that mothers' and fathers' scores on the coping strategy subscales had not significantly changed over the three-year period. Time 1 and Time 2 scores on all of the coping subscales were strongly positively associated, with the exception of fathers' scores on the Stoicism subscale. Test-retest reliability was adequate for all subscales except mothers' scores on the Passive Acceptance subscale and fathers' scores on the Stoicism subscale. These results, by demonstrating the stability of the Ways of Coping (Revised) Questionnaire over a 3-year time period, further illustrate the utility of this instrument for investigating coping with families with special problems.
通过比较68名患有唐氏综合征学龄儿童的母亲和53名父亲在3年时间间隔内,在Knussen等人(1992年)描述的五个应对策略子量表上的得分,评估了修订后的应对方式问卷随时间的稳定性。在本次分析中,分别对母亲和父亲的得分进行了分析。t检验表明,母亲和父亲在应对策略子量表上的得分在三年期间没有显著变化。除父亲在坚忍子量表上的得分外,所有应对子量表上的时间1和时间2得分都呈强正相关。除母亲在被动接受子量表上的得分和父亲在坚忍子量表上的得分外,所有子量表的重测信度都足够。这些结果通过证明修订后的应对方式问卷在3年时间内的稳定性,进一步说明了该工具在调查特殊问题家庭应对情况方面的实用性。