Suppr超能文献

对于年轻患者,铅笔尖式脊髓穿刺针是更好的选择吗?在一组年龄小于46岁的普通外科未筛选患者中比较24G Sprotte针与27G Quincke针。

Is the pencil point spinal needle a better choice in younger patients? A comparison of 24G Sprotte with 27G Quincke needles in an unselected group of general surgical patients below 46 years of age.

作者信息

Brattebø G, Wisborg T, Rodt S A, Røste I

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hammerfest Hospital, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995 May;39(4):535-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1995.tb04114.x.

Abstract

Reports have indicated that there are less postoperative complaints after the use of pencil pointed spinal needles. We compared a 24G Sprotte needle with a 27G Quincke needle in a randomised study of 200 healthy patients (49% females), aged 15-46 years. Four patients (2%) reported postdural puncture headache, three with the 24G Sprotte needle and one with the 27G Quincke needle. Thirteen patients (7%) suffered with nonspecific headache, with no significant difference between the two groups. Of the 57 (29%) who reported backpain, a significantly higher proportion had received spinal anaesthesia with the Sprotte needle (OR = 2.06). There was a significantly higher incidence of insufficient blocks after dural puncture with the Sprotte needle. Ease of needle insertion and number of puncture attempts was the same for both needle types.

摘要

报告表明,使用铅笔尖式脊髓穿刺针后术后投诉较少。我们在一项对200名年龄在15 - 46岁的健康患者(49%为女性)进行的随机研究中,将24G Sprotte针与27G Quincke针进行了比较。4名患者(2%)报告发生了硬膜穿刺后头痛,其中3名使用24G Sprotte针,1名使用27G Quincke针。13名患者(7%)患有非特异性头痛,两组之间无显著差异。在报告背痛的57名患者(29%)中,接受Sprotte针脊髓麻醉的比例显著更高(比值比 = 2.06)。使用Sprotte针进行硬膜穿刺后阻滞不全的发生率显著更高。两种针型的进针 ease 和穿刺尝试次数相同。 (注:“ease of needle insertion”这里直接保留英文未准确翻译,因为不太明确其准确含义,可能是“进针难易程度”之类的表述)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验