Suppr超能文献

用于检测肠致病性大肠杆菌的荧光肌动蛋白染色试验的评估

Evaluation of the fluorescence actin staining test for detection of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.

作者信息

Shariff M, Bhan M K, Knutton S, Das B K, Saini S, Kumar R

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Feb;31(2):386-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.386-389.1993.

Abstract

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) strains designated on the basis of their serotypes are epidemiologically associated with diarrhea. They adhere to the intestinal mucosa, producing the characteristic attaching and effacing (AE) lesion in an in vitro organ culture system. EPEC manifest localized adherence (LA) in the HEp-2 cell assay, and this is commonly used for clinical diagnosis. Recently, the fluorescence actin staining (FAS) test was proposed for the identification of E. coli causing the AE lesion. We therefore compared the FAS test with the HEp-2 cell assay and the EPEC adherence factor (EAF) probe assay for the detection of EPEC strains. Among 240 stool samples from children with diarrhea examined, 176 yielded E. coli and 14 of these strains showed the LA pattern in the HEp-2 cell assay; 11 of these were positive by both the EAF and the FAS tests. By using the HEp-2 cell assay as the "gold standard," the FAS test gave a sensitivity of 78.5% and a specificity of 100%. The three localized adherent FAS-negative strains tested subsequently were positive by the enteroaggregative E. coli DNA Probe and failed to produce the AE lesions characteristic of EPEC. When these strains were not considered, the sensitivity of the FAS test for detecting isolates that manifest LA was 100%. Against the EAF probe, the sensitivity and specificity of the FAS test were 91.6 and 100%, respectively. The FAS test avoids infrequent but nevertheless important phenotypic misclassifications in the HEp-2 cell assay, and it may therefore serve as a confirmatory test for EPEC.

摘要

根据血清型分类的肠致病性大肠杆菌(EPEC)菌株在流行病学上与腹泻相关。它们黏附于肠黏膜,在体外器官培养系统中产生特征性的黏附与抹消(AE)损伤。EPEC在HEp-2细胞检测中表现出局部黏附(LA),这常用于临床诊断。最近,有人提出用荧光肌动蛋白染色(FAS)试验来鉴定引起AE损伤的大肠杆菌。因此,我们将FAS试验与HEp-2细胞检测和EPEC黏附因子(EAF)探针检测进行比较,以检测EPEC菌株。在检测的240份腹泻儿童粪便样本中,176份检出大肠杆菌,其中14株在HEp-2细胞检测中表现出LA模式;其中11株EAF试验和FAS试验均为阳性。以HEp-2细胞检测作为“金标准”,FAS试验的灵敏度为78.5%,特异性为100%。随后检测的3株局部黏附FAS阴性菌株经肠聚集性大肠杆菌DNA探针检测为阳性,且未产生EPEC特征性的AE损伤。若不考虑这些菌株,FAS试验检测表现出LA的分离株的灵敏度为100%。与EAF探针相比,FAS试验的灵敏度和特异性分别为91.6%和100%。FAS试验避免了HEp-2细胞检测中偶尔出现但却很重要的表型错误分类,因此可作为EPEC的确诊试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf95/262770/f82f21e20271/jcm00014-0228-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验