• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻片离心机革兰氏染色与定量培养在诊断尿路感染中的效用

Utility of slide centrifuge gram's stain versus quantitative culture for diagnosis of urinary tract infection.

作者信息

Goswitz J J, Willard K E, Eastep S J, Shanholtzer C J, Olson M L, Pinnell M, Singleton T, Peterson L R

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1993 Feb;99(2):132-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/99.2.132.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/99.2.132
PMID:7679871
Abstract

The slide centrifuge (cytospin) Gram's-stain technique has been shown in previous studies to be a sensitive technique for detecting bacteriuria when compared to culture. The method concentrates urine sediment in a small defined area on a glass slide for Gram's staining. A positive test provides morphologic information about suspected pathogens. This study evaluated the cytospin technique using 788 urine specimens, on which routine culture was simultaneously performed, and compared both with clinical evidence for urinary tract infection. One hundred twelve of these specimens, which were cytospin positive and had a culture growing more than 100,000 CFU/mL, were assumed, by definition, to represent true urinary tract infection. Five hundred twenty-six specimens had negative cytospin and negative culture results (less than 1,000 CFU/mL) and were assumed, by definition, to rule out the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Clinical data were evaluated for 56 cytospin-positive specimens in which culture results were less than 100,000 CFU/mL. Of these specimens, 37 were false positive (no clinical evidence of urinary tract infection), 9 had clinical evidence of urinary tract infection, and for the remaining 10, data regarding clinical status could not be interpreted. Seventy-one specimens were cytospin negative, with cultures growing more than 1,000 CFU/mL. Of these, only one patient had clinical evidence of a urinary tract infection, and his culture result was less than 10,000 CFU/mL. The predictive value of a negative cytospin test was 99.8% compared to clinical information, whereas the predictive value of a negative culture (less than 100,000 CFU/mL) was 98.4%.

摘要

与培养法相比,载玻片离心机(细胞离心涂片法)革兰氏染色技术在先前研究中已被证明是一种检测菌尿症的敏感技术。该方法将尿沉渣浓缩在载玻片上一个小的特定区域进行革兰氏染色。阳性检测可提供有关可疑病原体的形态学信息。本研究使用788份尿液标本评估了细胞离心涂片法,同时对这些标本进行了常规培养,并将两者与尿路感染的临床证据进行比较。根据定义,这些标本中有112份细胞离心涂片法呈阳性且培养出的菌落数超过100,000 CFU/mL,被认为代表真正的尿路感染。526份标本细胞离心涂片法和培养结果均为阴性(低于1,000 CFU/mL),根据定义,被认为可排除尿路感染的诊断。对56份细胞离心涂片法呈阳性但培养结果低于100,000 CFU/mL的标本的临床数据进行了评估。在这些标本中,37份为假阳性(无尿路感染的临床证据),9份有尿路感染的临床证据,其余10份的临床状态数据无法解读。71份标本细胞离心涂片法为阴性,但培养出的菌落数超过1,000 CFU/mL。其中,只有一名患者有尿路感染的临床证据,其培养结果低于10,000 CFU/mL。与临床信息相比,细胞离心涂片法阴性检测的预测值为99.8%,而培养结果阴性(低于100,000 CFU/mL)的预测值为98.4%。

相似文献

1
Utility of slide centrifuge gram's stain versus quantitative culture for diagnosis of urinary tract infection.玻片离心机革兰氏染色与定量培养在诊断尿路感染中的效用
Am J Clin Pathol. 1993 Feb;99(2):132-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/99.2.132.
2
Clinical evaluation of the slide centrifuge (cytospin) gram's stained smear for the detection of bacteriuria and comparison with the FiltraCheck-UTI and UTIscreen.用于检测菌尿症的玻片离心机(细胞离心涂片器)革兰氏染色涂片的临床评估及其与FiltraCheck-UTI和UTIscreen的比较。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1995 Mar;103(3):316-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/103.3.316.
3
The slide centrifuge gram stain as a urine screening method.玻片离心革兰氏染色作为一种尿液筛查方法。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1991 Oct;96(4):454-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/96.4.454.
4
Acridine orange as a screen for organisms in clinical specimens and comparison with gram's stain.吖啶橙作为临床标本中微生物的筛选方法及其与革兰氏染色的比较。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 May;112(5):529-32.
5
Sonicated vascular catheter tip cultures. Quantitative association with catheter-related sepsis and the non-utility of an adjuvant cytocentrifuge Gram stain.超声处理的血管导管尖端培养物。与导管相关败血症的定量关联及辅助细胞离心革兰氏染色的无用性。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1996 Feb;105(2):210-5. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/105.2.210.
6
Sputum eosinophilia negates need to perform sputum Gram's stain.痰液嗜酸性粒细胞增多排除了进行痰液革兰氏染色的必要性。
Lung. 1993;171(1):15-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00177638.
7
[Evaluation of screening methods (catalase, sediment, reactive strip and Gram stain) in urinary tract infection in a Colombian university hospital].[哥伦比亚一家大学医院中尿路感染筛查方法(过氧化氢酶、沉淀物、反应试纸条和革兰氏染色)的评估]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1994 Mar;12(3):123-6.
8
Diagnosing gonorrhea. A comparison of standard and rapid techniques.淋病的诊断:标准技术与快速技术的比较
J Adolesc Health Care. 1987 Jul;8(4):344-8. doi: 10.1016/0197-0070(87)90006-4.
9
Gram's stain of peritoneal fluid is rarely helpful in the evaluation of the ascites patient.革兰氏染色法检测腹水对于腹水患者的评估很少有帮助。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;54(1):78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.020. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
10
[Gram stain and dipstick as diagnostic methods for urinary tract infection in febrile infants].[革兰氏染色和试纸条检测作为发热婴儿尿路感染的诊断方法]
An Esp Pediatr. 2000 Dec;53(6):561-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of a New Rapid Immunoassay Test Kit for Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Significant Bacteriuria.一种用于即时诊断显著菌尿症的新型快速免疫分析检测试剂盒的性能
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Sep;53(9):2805-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00353-15. Epub 2015 Jun 10.