Froehner S C
Department of Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7545.
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1993;16:347-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.002023.
A model of neuromuscular synaptogenesis predicts that factors released by the nerve, such as agrin, determine the time and site of AChR clustering. These factors are thought to bind to specific receptors on the muscle fiber and activate intracellular signaling pathways, which act ultimately on the AChR, on the postsynaptic cytoskeleton, or on proteins, such as the 43K protein, that link AChR to the cytoskeleton. This model is not yet entirely proven, but provides a clear framework for further studies. Clustering of sodium channels at the neuromuscular postsynaptic membrane may also involve interaction with the cytoskeleton, but the signaling molecules are not yet known. AChR clustering and sodium channel clustering are separable events, both in the molecules involved and in developmental timing. Ion channel clustering in the CNS is less well understood, but may have features in common with the neuromuscular model. For example, glycine receptors are associated with gephyrin, a protein that mediates linkage to synaptic microtubules, thus raising obvious analogies to muscle AChR and the 43K protein. It is unknown, however, if AChR clustering in neurons is regulated by mechanisms in common with muscle. Coclustering of ion channels at synapses, both across the synaptic gap and within the same postsynaptic site, is likely to be of major importance to synaptic modulation and integration. Alignment of postsynaptic receptors with presynaptic calcium channels is critical for rapid transmission, but is achieved by mechanisms not yet understood. According to current models, the codistribution of two types of glutamate receptors in the postsynaptic membrane on dendritic spines is important for initiation of LTP. It is reasonable to expect that the basic mechanisms currently being elucidated at the neuromuscular junction will lead to greater understanding of how the CNS uses ion channel distribution to modulate synaptic activity.
神经肌肉突触形成模型预测,神经释放的因子,如聚集蛋白,决定了乙酰胆碱受体(AChR)簇集的时间和位点。这些因子被认为与肌纤维上的特定受体结合,并激活细胞内信号通路,这些信号通路最终作用于AChR、突触后细胞骨架或连接AChR与细胞骨架的蛋白质,如43K蛋白。该模型尚未完全得到证实,但为进一步研究提供了一个清晰的框架。神经肌肉突触后膜上钠通道的簇集可能也涉及与细胞骨架的相互作用,但信号分子尚不清楚。AChR簇集和钠通道簇集在涉及的分子和发育时间上都是可分离的事件。中枢神经系统中离子通道的簇集了解较少,但可能具有与神经肌肉模型共同的特征。例如,甘氨酸受体与桥连蛋白相关,桥连蛋白是一种介导与突触微管连接的蛋白质,因此与肌肉AChR和43K蛋白有明显的相似之处。然而,尚不清楚神经元中AChR簇集是否受与肌肉相同机制的调节。突触处离子通道的共簇集,无论是跨越突触间隙还是在同一突触后位点内,可能对突触调制和整合至关重要。突触后受体与突触前钙通道的对齐对于快速传递至关重要,但实现机制尚不清楚。根据目前的模型,两种类型的谷氨酸受体在树突棘突触后膜上的共分布对于长时程增强的启动很重要。可以合理预期,目前在神经肌肉接头处阐明的基本机制将有助于更深入地理解中枢神经系统如何利用离子通道分布来调节突触活动。