Aldenberg T, Slob W
National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1993 Feb;25(1):48-63. doi: 10.1006/eesa.1993.1006.
This paper deals with the calculation of Hazardous Concentrations of toxic substances from small sets of laboratory toxicity data, e.g., NOECs. A procedure due to Van Straalen and Denneman, as adapted from Kooijman (case n = 1), in which one seeks a concentration that protects 95% of the biological species is modified to account for the uncertainty in the estimates. New constants are obtained by simulation. These allow the calculation of the one-sided 95% left confidence limit of the Hazardous Concentration, from the mean and standard deviation of a sample of (laboratory) toxicity data. This 95% confidence limit is always lower than the 95% certainty value calculated with the Kooijman (n = 1)/Van Straalen method. The authors also derive constants to calculate a one-sided 50% confidence value, that overpredicts as often as it underpredicts. This value may be used as a median guess of the Hazardous Concentration. It will always be higher than the 95% certainty value of the Kooijman (n = 1)/Van Straalen method. However, by using the 50% value, one runs the risk of protecting substantially less than 95% of the biological species.
本文探讨了如何根据少量实验室毒性数据(如无观测效应浓度)来计算有毒物质的危险浓度。对Van Straalen和Denneman提出的一种方法(该方法改编自Kooijman的方法,n = 1的情况)进行了修正,在该方法中,人们寻求一个能保护95%生物物种的浓度,以考虑估计值中的不确定性。通过模拟获得了新的常数。这些常数使得可以根据(实验室)毒性数据样本的均值和标准差来计算危险浓度的单侧95%左置信限。这个95%置信限总是低于用Kooijman(n = 1)/Van Straalen方法计算的95%确定性值。作者还推导了用于计算单侧50%置信值的常数,该值高估和低估的情况一样频繁。这个值可以用作危险浓度的中位数估计。它总是高于Kooijman(n = 1)/Van Straalen方法的95%确定性值。然而,使用50%的值时,存在保护的生物物种远少于95%的风险。