Devine D P, Leone P, Pocock D, Wise R A
Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993 Sep;266(3):1236-46.
In vivo microdialysis was used to assess the involvement of ventral tegmental area (VTA) mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors in modulation of basal extracellular ventral striatal dopamine (DA) and DA-metabolite concentrations. Independent groups of chloral hydrate-anesthetized rats were given VTA microinjections of selective opioid agonists, and extracellular ventral striatal DA and DA-metabolite concentrations were assayed using HPLC. VTA microinjections of [D-Ala2, N-Me-Phe4-Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO; a mu agonist) and [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]-enkephalin (DDDPE; a delta agonist) each caused dose-orderly increases in ventral striatal DA and DA-metabolite concentrations. The effective concentrations of DPDPE were 100- to 1000-fold higher than the effective concentrations of DAMGO. VTA microinjections of (trans-(dl)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclo-hexyl]- benzeneacetamide) methane sulfonate hydrate (U-50,488H); a kappa agonist) failed to alter ventral striatal DA concentrations at any dose tested, but subsequent systemic injections significantly decreased DA and DA-metabolite concentrations. Pretreatment with VTA microinjections of 17-cyclopropylmethyl-6,7-dehydro-4,5-epoxy-3,14-dihydroxy-6,7,2',3'- indolmorphinan hydrochloride (naltrindole; a delta antagonist) (delta antagonist) antagonized VTA DPDPE-mediated increases in ventral striatal DA and DA-metabolite concentrations but failed to antagonize VTA DAMGO-mediated increases. Pretreatment with D-Pen-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTOP; a mu antagonist) antagonized VTA DAMGO-mediated increases but failed to antagonize VTA DPDPE-mediated increases. Thus both mu and delta receptor agonist appear capable of increasing ventral striatal DA and DA-metabolite concentrations through selective actions on their preferred class of opioid receptors in the VTA. The increases in ventral striatal DA and DA-metabolite concentrations that are seen after systemic treatment with kappa opioid agonists appear not to involve VTA opioid receptors.
采用体内微透析技术评估腹侧被盖区(VTA)的μ、δ和κ阿片受体在调节基底外侧纹状体细胞外多巴胺(DA)及DA代谢物浓度中的作用。独立的水合氯醛麻醉大鼠组接受VTA微量注射选择性阿片受体激动剂,并用高效液相色谱法测定细胞外腹侧纹状体DA及DA代谢物浓度。VTA微量注射[D - Ala2,N - Me - Phe4 - Gly5 - ol] - 脑啡肽(DAMGO;一种μ激动剂)和[D - Pen2,D - Pen5] - 脑啡肽(DPDPE;一种δ激动剂)均使腹侧纹状体DA及DA代谢物浓度呈剂量依赖性增加。DPDPE的有效浓度比DAMGO的有效浓度高100至1000倍。VTA微量注射(反式 - (dl) - 3,4 - 二氯 - N - 甲基 - N - [2 - (1 - 吡咯烷基)环己基] - 苯乙酰胺)甲磺酸盐(U - 50,488H;一种κ激动剂)在任何测试剂量下均未改变腹侧纹状体DA浓度,但随后的全身注射显著降低了DA及DA代谢物浓度。VTA微量注射17 - 环丙基甲基 - 6,7 - 脱氢 - 4,5 - 环氧 - 3,14 - 二羟基 - 6,7,2',3' - 吲哚吗啡喃盐酸盐(纳曲吲哚;一种δ拮抗剂)预处理可拮抗VTA中DPDPE介导的腹侧纹状体DA及DA代谢物浓度增加,但不能拮抗VTA中DAMGO介导的增加。用D - Pen - Cys - Tyr - D - Trp - Orn - Thr - Pen - Thr - NH2(CTOP;一种μ拮抗剂)预处理可拮抗VTA中DAMGO介导的增加,但不能拮抗VTA中DPDPE介导的增加。因此,μ和δ受体激动剂似乎都能够通过对VTA中其偏好的阿片受体类别进行选择性作用来增加腹侧纹状体DA及DA代谢物浓度。用κ阿片受体激动剂进行全身治疗后观察到的腹侧纹状体DA及DA代谢物浓度增加似乎不涉及VTA阿片受体。