• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

VVI起搏时每搏量的逐搏变化作为DDD起搏血流动力学获益的预测指标。

Beat-to-beat variability in stroke volume during VVI pacing as predictor of hemodynamic benefit from DDD pacing.

作者信息

Dritsas A, Joshi J, Webb S C, Athanassopoulos G, Oakley C M, Nihoyannopoulos P

机构信息

Department of Medicine Clinical Cardiology, Hammersmith Hospital, Royal Postgraduate School, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Aug;16(8):1713-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01042.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01042.x
PMID:7690940
Abstract

To determine whether the magnitude of Beat-to-Beat variability in stroke volume (SV) during VVI pacing can predict hemodynamic benefit from DDD pacing, we undertook Doppler recordings of systolic and diastolic LV flow during VVI and DDD pacing in 20 patients (age 54 +/- 9 years) with DDD pacemakers implanted due to AV block. SV increased by 19% +/- 10% from VVI to DDD (P < 0.01). This increase was greater (29% +/- 9%) in patients with a ratio of early (E)/late (A) filling < 1 compared to those with E/A > 1 (10% +/- 9%) (P < 0.001). Beat-to-Beat variability in SV was greater in VVI (13% +/- 8%) compared to DDD (4% +/- 1%) (P < 0.001). Patients with E/A < 1 showed greater Beat-to-Beat variability in SV during VVI pacing (19 +/- 6%) compared to those with E/A > 1 (8% +/- 4%) (P < 0.001). Beat-to-Beat variability in SV during VVI pacing correlated with both percent change in SV from VVI to DDD (r = 0.89, P < 0.001) and E/A (r = -0.71, P < 0.001). In conclusion, patients with E/A < 1 derive greater hemodynamic benefit at rest from DDD pacing compared with E/A > 1. In addition, patients with complete AV block who show large variations in SV during VVI pacing may obtain greater hemodynamic benefit at rest from DDD pacing than patients with small variations.

摘要

为了确定心室按需起搏(VVI)时每搏量(SV)逐搏变化的幅度是否能够预测双腔起搏(DDD)的血流动力学益处,我们对20例(年龄54±9岁)因房室传导阻滞植入DDD起搏器的患者在VVI和DDD起搏期间进行了左心室收缩期和舒张期血流的多普勒记录。SV从VVI起搏到DDD起搏增加了19%±10%(P<0.01)。与E/A>1(10%±9%)的患者相比,舒张早期(E)/舒张晚期(A)充盈率<1的患者增加幅度更大(29%±9%)(P<0.001)。与DDD起搏(4%±1%)相比,VVI起搏时SV的逐搏变化更大(13%±8%)(P<0.001)。与E/A>1(8%±4%)的患者相比,E/A<1的患者在VVI起搏时SV的逐搏变化更大(19±6%)(P<0.001)。VVI起搏时SV的逐搏变化与SV从VVI起搏到DDD起搏的变化百分比(r=0.89,P<0.001)和E/A(r=-0.71,P<0.001)均相关。总之,与E/A>1的患者相比,E/A<1的患者静息时从DDD起搏中获得更大的血流动力学益处。此外,与SV变化小的患者相比,在VVI起搏时SV变化大的完全性房室传导阻滞患者静息时从DDD起搏中可能获得更大的血流动力学益处。

相似文献

1
Beat-to-beat variability in stroke volume during VVI pacing as predictor of hemodynamic benefit from DDD pacing.VVI起搏时每搏量的逐搏变化作为DDD起搏血流动力学获益的预测指标。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Aug;16(8):1713-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01042.x.
2
A time-related study of the hemodynamic benefit of atrioventricular synchronous pacing evaluated by Doppler echocardiography.一项通过多普勒超声心动图评估房室同步起搏血流动力学益处的时间相关性研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1985 Nov;8(6):838-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1985.tb05903.x.
3
[The effect of changes in stroke volume on QT dispersion during long-term DDD and VVI pacing].[长期DDD和VVI起搏期间每搏输出量变化对QT离散度的影响]
Przegl Lek. 2001;58(3):111-6.
4
Noninvasive beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure measurement during VVI and DDD pacing: relationship to symptomatic benefit from DDD pacing.VVI和DDD起搏期间的无创逐搏动脉血压测量:与DDD起搏的症状改善的关系
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jan;20(1 Pt 1):25-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04808.x.
5
Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays.通过阻抗心动描记法测量起搏器患者静息时的心输出量:不同房室延迟的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Mar 1;21(3):761-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90110-m.
6
Lack of influence of atrioventricular delay on stroke volume at rest in patients with complete atrioventricular block and dual chamber pacing.完全性房室传导阻滞和双腔起搏患者静息时房室延迟对每搏量无影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Jul;13(7):916-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb02129.x.
7
Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.DDD起搏器患者中VVI起搏与DDD起搏的临床及血流动力学比较
Am J Cardiol. 1988 Feb 1;61(4):323-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90938-1.
8
Preimplantation echo Doppler evaluation of VVI versus DDD pacing.VVI与DDD起搏的植入前超声多普勒评估
Echocardiography. 1995 Jul;12(4):335-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.1995.tb00556.x.
9
Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers.在次极量运动时,房室同步起搏相比频率应答式起搏具有更优的心脏血流动力学:活动感知型DDDR起搏器的观察结果
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):1832-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06899.x.
10
Comparison of DDD and 'VVI-R like' pacing during moderate exercise: echo-Doppler study.中等强度运动期间DDD起搏与“类VVI-R”起搏的比较:超声多普勒研究
Eur Heart J. 1992 Jul;13(7):914-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060292.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.用于病态窦房结综合征和房室传导阻滞的双腔与单腔心室起搏器
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(2):CD003710. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003710.pub2.