• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

VVI和DDD起搏期间的无创逐搏动脉血压测量:与DDD起搏的症状改善的关系

Noninvasive beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure measurement during VVI and DDD pacing: relationship to symptomatic benefit from DDD pacing.

作者信息

Channon K M, Hargreaves M R, Gardner M, Ormerod O J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jan;20(1 Pt 1):25-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04808.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04808.x
PMID:9121968
Abstract

To noninvasively assess the hemodynamic effects of VVI and DDD pacing modes we measured beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure during VVI and DDD pacing in 30 patients with complete heart block (CHB), using fingertip photoplethysmography. Of these patients, 15 undertook a double-blind cross-over comparison of the symptomatic effects of VVI versus DDD pacing to determine the relationship between blood pressure changes and the occurrence of symptoms suggestive of the pacemaker syndrome during ventricular pacing. Mean (SD) systolic blood pressure was 11.7 (15.4) mmHg lower during VVI pacing compared to DDD pacing (P < 0.0005). The mean (SD) beat-to-beat variability of systolic blood pressure was 5.20 (2.87%) in VVI mode versus 2.12 (1.07%) in DDD mode (P < 0.0000005). In comparison with DDD pacing, the excess of symptoms experienced by patients during VVI pacing did not correlate with the change in mean systolic blood pressure, but was significantly correlated with the increase in beat-to-beat systolic blood pressure variation during VVI pacing (r = 0.58, P = 0.024). We conclude that noninvasive measurement of fingertip arterial beat-to-beat blood pressure is a rapid and simple method of assessing the hemodynamic effect of VVI pacing. Beat-to-beat blood pressure variability was related to symptomatic intolerance of VVI pacing and may have potential utility as an aid to diagnosis or as a predictor of pacemaker syndrome.

摘要

为了无创评估VVI和DDD起搏模式的血流动力学效应,我们使用指尖光电容积脉搏波描记法,对30例完全性心脏传导阻滞(CHB)患者在VVI和DDD起搏期间逐搏测量动脉血压。其中15例患者对VVI与DDD起搏的症状性效应进行了双盲交叉比较,以确定心室起搏期间血压变化与起搏器综合征症状出现之间的关系。与DDD起搏相比,VVI起搏期间平均(标准差)收缩压降低了11.7(15.4)mmHg(P<0.0005)。VVI模式下收缩压的平均(标准差)逐搏变异性为5.20(2.87%),而DDD模式下为2.12(1.07%)(P<0.0000005)。与DDD起搏相比,患者在VVI起搏期间出现的症状增加与平均收缩压变化无关,但与VVI起搏期间逐搏收缩压变化增加显著相关(r=0.58,P=0.024)。我们得出结论,无创测量指尖动脉逐搏血压是评估VVI起搏血流动力学效应的一种快速简便的方法。逐搏血压变异性与VVI起搏的症状不耐受有关,可能具有作为诊断辅助手段或起搏器综合征预测指标的潜在用途。

相似文献

1
Noninvasive beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure measurement during VVI and DDD pacing: relationship to symptomatic benefit from DDD pacing.VVI和DDD起搏期间的无创逐搏动脉血压测量:与DDD起搏的症状改善的关系
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jan;20(1 Pt 1):25-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04808.x.
2
Beat-to-beat variability in stroke volume during VVI pacing as predictor of hemodynamic benefit from DDD pacing.VVI起搏时每搏量的逐搏变化作为DDD起搏血流动力学获益的预测指标。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Aug;16(8):1713-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01042.x.
3
Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.DDD起搏器患者中VVI起搏与DDD起搏的临床及血流动力学比较
Am J Cardiol. 1988 Feb 1;61(4):323-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90938-1.
4
A comparison of symptoms and intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure during long term dual chamber atrioventricular synchronous (DDD) and ventricular demand (VVI) pacing.长期双腔房室同步起搏(DDD)与心室按需起搏(VVI)期间症状与动脉内动态血压的比较。
Br Heart J. 1987 Jul;58(1):34-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.58.1.34.
5
Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays.通过阻抗心动描记法测量起搏器患者静息时的心输出量:不同房室延迟的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Mar 1;21(3):761-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90110-m.
6
Comparison of dual chamber and ventricular rate responsive pacing in patients over 75 with complete heart block.75岁以上完全性心脏传导阻滞患者双腔起搏与心室率应答性起搏的比较
Br Heart J. 1995 Oct;74(4):397-402. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.4.397.
7
[The effect of changes in stroke volume on QT dispersion during long-term DDD and VVI pacing].[长期DDD和VVI起搏期间每搏输出量变化对QT离散度的影响]
Przegl Lek. 2001;58(3):111-6.
8
DDD vs. VVI pacing in patients aged over 75 years with complete heart block: a double-blind crossover comparison.75岁以上完全性心脏传导阻滞患者的DDD起搏与VVI起搏:双盲交叉比较
Q J Med. 1994 Apr;87(4):245-51.
9
[Comparison of VVI and DDD cardiac stimulation during exercise test evaluated by respiratory gas exchange measurement. Study of patients with normal systolic function and complete atrioventricular block unchanged during exercise test].[通过呼吸气体交换测量评估运动试验期间VVI和DDD心脏刺激的比较。运动试验期间收缩功能正常且完全房室传导阻滞不变的患者研究]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1993 Jan;86(1):69-74.
10
[Effect of AV synchronization and rate increase on hemodynamics and on atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with total AV block].[房室同步及心率增加对完全性房室传导阻滞患者血流动力学及心房利钠肽的影响]
Z Kardiol. 1990 Aug;79(8):547-56.

引用本文的文献

1
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Contributes to a Greater Acute Blood Pressure Reduction Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing.与右心室起搏相比,左束支区域起搏能使急性血压降低幅度更大。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 27;24(12):372. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2412372. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Hemodynamic effect of atrioventricular and interventricular dyssynchrony in patients with biventricular pacing: Implications for the pacemaker syndrome.双心室起搏患者房室及室内不同步的血流动力学效应:对起搏器综合征的影响。
J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2012 Jul;3(3):200-3. doi: 10.4103/0975-3583.98892.
3
Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.
用于病态窦房结综合征和房室传导阻滞的双腔与单腔心室起搏器
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(2):CD003710. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003710.pub2.