• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经尿道前列腺切开术:长期疗效的客观与主观评估

Transurethral incision of the prostate: an objective and subjective evaluation of long-term efficacy.

作者信息

Sirls L T, Ganabathi K, Zimmern P E, Roskamp D A, Wolde-Tsadik G, Leach G E

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

J Urol. 1993 Nov;150(5 Pt 2):1615-21. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35858-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35858-5
PMID:7692097
Abstract

The emergence of less invasive therapies has demanded the reassessment of surgical procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. This study was designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of transurethral incision of the prostate using objective (urodynamic) and subjective (symptom score and assessment of satisfaction) parameters, and investigate sexual function. The results of transurethral incision of the prostate in 41 men (mean age 63.4 years) were reviewed, with a mean followup of 53 months (range 12 to 96). Preoperative symptom score (based on the Madsen-Iversen score) and urodynamic evaluation were compared to recent post-transurethral incision symptom score, urodynamic evaluation and interview to determine patient satisfaction. Total symptom score, as well as obstructive and irritative components, significantly decreased after transurethral incision of the prostate (p < 0.0001). Mean detrusor pressure at peak flow decreased from 85 to 44 cm. water (p < 0.0001) and mean maximal detrusor pressure decreased from 114 to 55 cm. water (p < 0.0001). Mean peak urine flow rates increased from 10.3 to 15.3 cc per second (p = 0.019). Of the men 32 (82%) reported long-term improvement after transurethral incision of the prostate, with an overall satisfaction rate of 67% (range 0 to 100). Regardless of objective urodynamic criteria (indicating obstruction or relief of obstruction), the number of men reporting subjective improvement and the degree of improvement were similar. Only 4 men (11%) reported new retrograde ejaculation. The proportion of men with improvement after transurethral incision of the prostate compares favorably to long-term data available on transurethral resection of the prostate. Assessing the degree of improvement (overall satisfaction) is unique and has not been previously reported. These results clearly demonstrate that in selected patients transurethral incision of the prostate is an effective procedure for long-term relief of outlet obstruction.

摘要

侵入性较小的治疗方法的出现,要求重新评估治疗良性前列腺增生的外科手术。本研究旨在使用客观(尿动力学)和主观(症状评分及满意度评估)参数评估经尿道前列腺切开术的长期疗效,并调查性功能。回顾了41名男性(平均年龄63.4岁)经尿道前列腺切开术的结果,平均随访53个月(范围12至96个月)。将术前症状评分(基于马德森 - 艾弗森评分)和尿动力学评估与最近经尿道前列腺切开术后的症状评分、尿动力学评估及访谈进行比较,以确定患者满意度。经尿道前列腺切开术后,总症状评分以及梗阻性和刺激性成分均显著降低(p < 0.0001)。平均排尿峰值逼尿肌压力从85厘米水柱降至44厘米水柱(p < 0.0001),平均最大逼尿肌压力从114厘米水柱降至55厘米水柱(p < 0.0001)。平均最大尿流率从每秒10.3毫升增加至15.3毫升(p = 0.019)。32名男性(82%)报告经尿道前列腺切开术后有长期改善,总体满意率为67%(范围0至100)。无论客观尿动力学标准(表明梗阻或梗阻缓解)如何,报告主观改善的男性数量及改善程度相似。只有4名男性(11%)报告出现新的逆行射精。经尿道前列腺切开术后改善的男性比例与经尿道前列腺切除术的现有长期数据相比具有优势。评估改善程度(总体满意度)是独特的,此前尚未见报道。这些结果清楚地表明,对于选定的患者,经尿道前列腺切开术是长期缓解出口梗阻的有效方法。

相似文献

1
Transurethral incision of the prostate: an objective and subjective evaluation of long-term efficacy.经尿道前列腺切开术:长期疗效的客观与主观评估
J Urol. 1993 Nov;150(5 Pt 2):1615-21. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35858-5.
2
[Transurethral incision of the prostate: an objective and subjective evaluation of long-term efficacy].经尿道前列腺切开术:长期疗效的客观与主观评估
J Urol (Paris). 1994;100(5):249-56.
3
Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate: a urodynamic based study with 2-year followup.经尿道前列腺针刺消融术:一项基于尿动力学的2年随访研究。
J Urol. 1997 Nov;158(5):1834-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64140-5.
4
Transurethral incision of the bladder neck: an objective and subjective evaluation of its efficacy.经尿道膀胱颈切开术:对其疗效的客观与主观评估
Int Urol Nephrol. 1995;27(6):717-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02552137.
5
The effects of transurethral needle ablation and resection of the prostate on pressure flow urodynamic parameters: analysis of the United States randomized study.经尿道针刺消融术和前列腺切除术对压力流尿动力学参数的影响:美国随机研究分析
J Urol. 1999 Jul;162(1):92-7. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199907000-00023.
6
Holmium:YAG transurethral incision versus laser photoselective vaporization for benign prostatic hyperplasia in a small prostate.钬激光经尿道前列腺切开术与激光光选择性汽化术治疗小前列腺良性前列腺增生的比较。
J Urol. 2014 Jan;191(1):148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.113. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
7
Transurethral resection versus incision of the prostate: a randomized, prospective study.经尿道前列腺切除术与前列腺切开术:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Urology. 1995 May;45(5):768-75. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80081-8.
8
Predictors of short-term overactive bladder symptom improvement after transurethral resection of prostate in men with benign prostatic obstruction.良性前列腺梗阻男性经尿道前列腺切除术后短期膀胱过度活动症症状改善的预测因素。
Int J Urol. 2014 Oct;21(10):1035-40. doi: 10.1111/iju.12482. Epub 2014 May 13.
9
Transurethral microwave therapy in 200 patients with a minimum followup of 2 years: urodynamic and clinical results.200例患者经尿道微波治疗,最短随访2年:尿动力学及临床结果
J Urol. 2002 Jun;167(6):2496-501.
10
Transurethral incision of the prostate: a preoperative and postoperative analysis of symptoms and urodynamic findings.经尿道前列腺切开术:症状及尿动力学检查结果的术前与术后分析
J Urol. 1989 Dec;142(6):1507-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39141-3.

引用本文的文献

1
[S2e guideline of the German urologists: Instrumental treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].[德国泌尿科医生S2e指南:良性前列腺增生的器械治疗]
Urologe A. 2016 Feb;55(2):195-207. doi: 10.1007/s00120-015-3983-0.
2
Diagnosis and treatment of primary bladder neck obstruction in men.男性原发性膀胱颈梗阻的诊断与治疗
Curr Urol Rep. 2005 Jul;6(4):271-5. doi: 10.1007/s11934-005-0020-7.
3
Overactive bladder in the male patient: bladder, outlet, or both?男性患者的膀胱过度活动症:是膀胱、尿道出口,还是两者皆有?
Curr Urol Rep. 2002 Dec;3(6):445-51. doi: 10.1007/s11934-002-0095-3.
4
Sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.良性前列腺增生患者的性功能
Curr Urol Rep. 2001 Aug;2(4):292-6. doi: 10.1007/s11934-001-0066-0.
5
Changing therapeutic regimens in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clinical and economic considerations.良性前列腺增生治疗方案的变更:临床与经济考量
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(2):131-53. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119020-00003.
6
Benign prostatic hyperplasia.良性前列腺增生
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Apr;47(417):235-40.