Soustiel J F, Hafner H, Guilburd J N, Zaaroor M, Levi L, Feinsod M
Department of Neurosurgery, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Nov;87(5):277-83. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90180-4.
Forty-five comatose patients were prospectively studied by means of clinical examination and evoked potentials. In each patient, clinical data included Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, age, pupillary response to light, corneal reflex, and eye movements. Neurophysiological evaluation was based on brain-stem trigeminal evoked potentials (BTEPs) and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs). For each physiological test, a progressive grading system was designed. This system was based on the evaluation of central conduction times along the trigeminal and the auditory pathways within the brain-stem. The accuracy of the clinical and the neurophysiological indicants in predicting "favorable" or "unfavorable" outcome was assessed singly and in combination. Of the clinical indicants, the GCS provided the most accurate prognosis (80%). Similar results were provided by the BAEP and the BTEP, with significant improvement in the confidence of outcome prediction. No significant difference in the accuracy of outcome predictions could be found between combined clinical data and neurophysiological data. However, the combination of clinical and neurophysiological data markedly increased both the accuracy and the confidence of outcome prediction, reaching 86% correct predictions at the over 90% confidence level with only 2% false pessimistic errors. According to these findings, a clinical-physiological coma scale, the trigeminal-auditory Glasgow (Coma Scale) score (TAG score) was designed. The TAG score demonstrated the highest accuracy at each confidence level as compared to other single indicants. We concluded that the TAG score may improve the evaluation of deep comatose patients and assist the physician in the management of such patients.
对45例昏迷患者进行了前瞻性临床检查和诱发电位研究。每位患者的临床数据包括格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、年龄、瞳孔对光反应、角膜反射和眼球运动。神经生理学评估基于脑干三叉神经诱发电位(BTEP)和脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)。对于每项生理测试,设计了一个渐进分级系统。该系统基于对脑干内三叉神经和听觉通路中央传导时间的评估。单独和联合评估临床指标和神经生理学指标预测“良好”或“不良”结局的准确性。在临床指标中,GCS提供了最准确的预后(80%)。BAEP和BTEP也有类似结果,结局预测的可信度有显著提高。联合临床数据和神经生理学数据在结局预测准确性方面无显著差异。然而,临床和神经生理学数据的联合显著提高了结局预测的准确性和可信度,在超过90%的置信水平下正确预测率达到86%,假阴性错误仅为2%。根据这些发现,设计了一种临床-生理昏迷量表,即三叉神经-听觉格拉斯哥(昏迷量表)评分(TAG评分)。与其他单一指标相比,TAG评分在每个置信水平下都显示出最高的准确性。我们得出结论,TAG评分可能会改善对深度昏迷患者的评估,并协助医生管理此类患者。