• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依诺肝素与低剂量华法林预防全髋关节置换术后深静脉血栓形成的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin vs low-dose warfarin in the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement surgery.

作者信息

Menzin J, Colditz G A, Regan M M, Richner R E, Oster G

机构信息

Policy Analysis Inc., Brookline, Mass.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1995 Apr 10;155(7):757-64.

PMID:7695464
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enoxaparin sodium, a low-molecular-weight heparin, was recently approved for use in the United States to prevent deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement surgery. Its cost-effectiveness relative to prophylaxis with low-dose warfarin sodium is unknown.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was developed to compare two strategies of prophylaxis for deep-vein thrombosis with a strategy of not using prophylaxis in a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery. For each of these strategies, we estimated the expected number of cases of confirmed deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, the expected number of thromboembolic deaths, and the expected costs of venous thromboembolic care, including prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment. Data were drawn primarily from the published literature.

RESULTS

Compared with no prophylaxis, the use of low-dose warfarin would be expected to reduce the number of cases of confirmed deep-vein thrombosis from about 1000 (per 10,000 patients) to 420 and the number of thromboembolic deaths from about 250 to 110. Expected costs of care related to deep-vein thrombosis also would be reduced from approximately $530 to $330 per patient. Prophylaxis with enoxaparin would be expected to reduce further the number of cases of confirmed deep-vein thrombosis and the number of thromboembolic deaths (to 250 and 70, respectively) but increase costs of care by approximately $50 per patient. The cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin (relative to low-dose warfarin) is estimated to be approximately $12,000 per death averted.

CONCLUSION

Although enoxaparin is more costly than low-dose warfarin, its cost-effectiveness in total hip replacement compares favorably with that of other generally accepted medical interventions.

摘要

背景

依诺肝素钠,一种低分子量肝素,最近在美国被批准用于预防全髋关节置换术后深静脉血栓形成。其相对于低剂量华法林钠预防的成本效益尚不清楚。

方法

建立了一个决策分析模型,以比较在一个假设的10000例接受全髋关节置换手术的患者队列中,两种深静脉血栓形成预防策略与不进行预防的策略。对于这些策略中的每一种,我们估计了确诊的深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞病例的预期数量、血栓栓塞性死亡的预期数量以及静脉血栓栓塞护理的预期成本,包括预防、诊断和治疗。数据主要来自已发表的文献。

结果

与不进行预防相比,使用低剂量华法林预计可将确诊的深静脉血栓形成病例数从约1000例(每10000例患者)减少至420例,血栓栓塞性死亡数从约250例减少至110例。与深静脉血栓形成相关的护理预期成本也将从每位患者约530美元降至330美元。依诺肝素预防预计可进一步减少确诊的深静脉血栓形成病例数和血栓栓塞性死亡数(分别降至250例和70例),但每位患者的护理成本增加约50美元。依诺肝素(相对于低剂量华法林)的成本效益估计约为每避免一例死亡12000美元。

结论

尽管依诺肝素比低剂量华法林成本更高,但其在全髋关节置换中的成本效益与其他普遍接受的医学干预措施相比具有优势。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin vs low-dose warfarin in the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement surgery.依诺肝素与低剂量华法林预防全髋关节置换术后深静脉血栓形成的成本效益分析
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Apr 10;155(7):757-64.
2
Cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin versus warfarin prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement.全髋关节置换术后依诺肝素与华法林预防深静脉血栓形成的成本效益分析
CMAJ. 1994 Apr 1;150(7):1083-90.
3
Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin vs warfarin for prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis after hip or knee implantation. An economic perspective.皮下注射低分子量肝素与华法林预防髋或膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓形成的经济学视角
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Feb 10;157(3):298-303.
4
Out of hospital antithrombotic prophylaxis after total hip replacement: low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, aspirin or nothing? A cost-effectiveness analysis.全髋关节置换术后院外抗血栓预防:低分子量肝素、华法林、阿司匹林还是不进行预防?成本效益分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2002 Apr;87(4):586-92.
5
Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement. A cost-utility analysis.延长依诺肝素治疗以预防初次髋关节或膝关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞。一项成本效益分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Oct;124(8):507-17. doi: 10.1007/s00402-004-0720-3. Epub 2004 Sep 10.
6
Warfarin vs enoxaparin for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis after total hip & total knee arthroplasty: a cost comparison.华法林与依诺肝素用于全髋关节和全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓形成预防的成本比较
J Ky Med Assoc. 1998 Apr;96(4):143-8.
7
Cost implications of low molecular weight heparins as prophylaxis following total hip and knee replacement.低分子量肝素用于全髋关节和膝关节置换术后预防的成本影响
Vasc Med. 2001;6(1):23-9.
8
A probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for the prophylaxis of deep-vein thrombosis following major trauma.依诺肝素与普通肝素预防重大创伤后深静脉血栓形成的概率性成本效益分析。
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Summer;14(2):e215-26. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
9
Enoxaparin in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis.依诺肝素预防深静脉血栓形成
Am Fam Physician. 1994 Dec;50(8):1763-8.
10
A probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for the prophylaxis of deep-vein thrombosis following major trauma.依诺肝素与普通肝素预防严重创伤后深静脉血栓形成的概率性成本效益分析。
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Summer;14(2):e215-26. Epub 2007 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Treatment Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis in Clinic of Vascular Surgery Sarajevo.萨拉热窝血管外科诊所治疗急性深静脉血栓形成的成本效益分析。
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017 Aug 13;5(5):681-685. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.139. eCollection 2017 Aug 15.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Different Strategies for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Hip Replacement in China.中国全髋关节置换术后不同静脉血栓栓塞预防策略的成本效益分析
Adv Ther. 2017 Feb;34(2):466-480. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0460-0. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
3
Cost Effectiveness of Apixaban and Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Knee Replacement in China.
阿哌沙班与依诺肝素在中国全膝关节置换术后预防静脉血栓栓塞的成本效益分析
Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Dec;36(12):1001-1010. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0444-5.
4
Economic analyses of venous thromboembolism prevention strategies in hospitalized patients: a systematic review.住院患者静脉血栓栓塞预防策略的经济分析:一项系统评价。
Crit Care. 2012 Mar 9;16(2):R43. doi: 10.1186/cc11241.
5
Screening for deep vein thrombosis after periacetabular osteotomy in adult patients: is it necessary?成年患者髋臼周围截骨术后深静脉血栓形成的筛查:有必要吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2500-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3614-x. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
6
A multi-perspective cost-effectiveness analysis comparing rivaroxaban with enoxaparin sodium for thromboprophylaxis after total hip and knee replacement in the German healthcare setting.多视角成本效益分析比较利伐沙班与依诺肝素钠用于德国医疗保健环境下全髋关节和膝关节置换术后的血栓预防。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 9;12:192. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-192.
7
Value-of-information analysis to reduce decision uncertainty associated with the choice of thromboprophylaxis after total hip replacement in the Irish healthcare setting.信息价值分析在爱尔兰医疗保健环境下降低全髋关节置换术后血栓预防选择的决策不确定性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Oct 1;30(10):941-59. doi: 10.2165/11591510-000000000-00000.
8
A cost-effectiveness model comparing rivaroxaban and dabigatran etexilate with enoxaparin sodium as thromboprophylaxis after total hip and total knee replacement in the irish healthcare setting.比较利伐沙班和达比加群酯与依诺肝素钠作为爱尔兰医疗保健环境下全髋关节和全膝关节置换术后血栓预防的成本效益模型。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(10):829-46. doi: 10.2165/11313800-000000000-00000.
9
Strategies for the management of suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.疑似肝素诱导的血小板减少症的管理策略:一项成本效益分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(11):949-61. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725110-00005.
10
Cost-effectiveness of extended prophylaxis with fondaparinux compared with low molecular weight heparin against venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.与低分子量肝素相比,磺达肝癸钠延长预防对髋部骨折手术患者静脉血栓栓塞的成本效益。
Eur J Health Econ. 2007 Dec;8(4):313-23. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0017-2. Epub 2007 Jan 16.