• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sensitivity and specificity of rapid diagnostic tests for detection of group B streptococcal antigen in bacteremic neonates.用于检测菌血症新生儿中B族链球菌抗原的快速诊断试验的敏感性和特异性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jan;33(1):193-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.193-198.1995.
2
Detection of group B streptococcal antigen in body fluids by a latex-coupled monoclonal antibody assay.通过乳胶偶联单克隆抗体检测法检测体液中的B族链球菌抗原。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Nov;20(5):852-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.5.852-854.1984.
3
False-negative urine latex particle agglutination testing in neonates with group B streptococcal bacteremia. A function of improper test implementation?
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1993 Aug;32(8):467-71. doi: 10.1177/000992289303200805.
4
Comparison of two antigen assays for rapid intrapartum detection of vaginal group B streptococcal colonization.两种抗原检测方法用于分娩期快速检测阴道B族链球菌定植的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jan;31(1):78-82. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.1.78-82.1993.
5
Comparison of commercially available group B streptococcal latex agglutination assays.市售B族链球菌乳胶凝集试验的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Dec;29(12):2895-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.12.2895-2896.1991.
6
Evaluation of suprapubic bladder aspiration for detection of group B streptococcal antigen by latex agglutination in neonatal urine.经耻骨上膀胱穿刺抽吸术获取新生儿尿液,采用乳胶凝集试验评估B族链球菌抗原检测情况。
Am J Perinatol. 1996 May;13(4):235-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994371.
7
Evaluation of a commercially available latex agglutination test for rapid diagnosis of group B streptococcal infection.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987 Feb;6(2):177-81. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198702000-00007.
8
The role of a commercial latex agglutination test in the diagnosis of group B streptococcal infection in neonates.
Acta Paediatr Scand. 1991 Feb;80(2):167-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1991.tb11829.x.
9
Clinical application of urine antigen detection in early onset group B streptococcal disease.尿抗原检测在早发型B族链球菌病中的临床应用
Arch Dis Child. 1992 Oct;67(10 Spec No):1198-200. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.10_spec_no.1198.
10
Investigation of apparent false-positive urine latex particle agglutination tests for the detection of group B streptococcus antigen.用于检测B族链球菌抗原的尿液乳胶颗粒凝集试验假阳性现象的调查。
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Oct;27(10):2214-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2214-2217.1989.

引用本文的文献

1
How can the microbiologist help in diagnosing neonatal sepsis?微生物学家如何协助诊断新生儿败血症?
Int J Pediatr. 2012;2012:120139. doi: 10.1155/2012/120139. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
2
Laboratory detection of group B Streptococcus for prevention of perinatal disease.用于预防围产期疾病的B族链球菌实验室检测
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 Sep;23(9):665-71. doi: 10.1007/s10096-004-1183-8. Epub 2004 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Neonatal sepsis caused by a new group B streptococcal serotype.
J Pediatr. 1993 Apr;122(4):638-40. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83554-1.
2
False-negative urine latex particle agglutination testing in neonates with group B streptococcal bacteremia. A function of improper test implementation?
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1993 Aug;32(8):467-71. doi: 10.1177/000992289303200805.
3
Group B streptococcus serotype V.
J Pediatr. 1993 Sep;123(3):494-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81778-0.
4
Commercial latex agglutination test for rapid diagnosis of group B streptococcal infection in infants.用于快速诊断婴儿B族链球菌感染的商业乳胶凝集试验。
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Sep;12(3):442-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.3.442-444.1980.
5
Rapid detection of neonatal group B streptococcal infections by latex agglutination.通过乳胶凝集试验快速检测新生儿B族链球菌感染
J Pediatr. 1980 Jan;96(1):104-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(80)80340-4.
6
Detection of group B streptococcal antigen in early-onset and late-onset group B streptococcal disease with the Wellcogen Strep B latex agglutination test.采用Wellcogen B族链球菌乳胶凝集试验检测早发型和晚发型B族链球菌病中的B族链球菌抗原。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Oct;16(4):656-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.4.656-658.1982.
7
Detection of group B streptococcal antigen in body fluids by a latex-coupled monoclonal antibody assay.通过乳胶偶联单克隆抗体检测法检测体液中的B族链球菌抗原。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Nov;20(5):852-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.5.852-854.1984.
8
Comparison of three major antigen detection methods for the diagnosis of Group B streptococcal sepsis in neonates.三种主要抗原检测方法用于诊断新生儿B族链球菌败血症的比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1983 Nov-Dec;2(6):432-5. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198311000-00004.
9
Rapid diagnosis of group B streptococcal infection utilizing a commercially available latex agglutination assay.利用市售乳胶凝集试验快速诊断B族链球菌感染。
Pediatrics. 1984 Jan;73(1):27-30.
10
Commercial latex agglutination for detection of group B streptococcal antigen in body fluids.用于检测体液中B族链球菌抗原的商业乳胶凝集试验。
J Pediatr. 1983 Mar;102(3):393-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(83)80657-x.

用于检测菌血症新生儿中B族链球菌抗原的快速诊断试验的敏感性和特异性。

Sensitivity and specificity of rapid diagnostic tests for detection of group B streptococcal antigen in bacteremic neonates.

作者信息

Greenberg D N, Ascher D P, Yoder B A, Hensley D M, Heiman H S, Keith J F

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Wilford Hall U.S. Air Force Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jan;33(1):193-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.193-198.1995.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.33.1.193-198.1995
PMID:7699040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC227906/
Abstract

Latex particle agglutination (LPA) testing for antigen to group B streptococcus (GBS) has been useful in the diagnosis of GBS sepsis in newborns. However, recent reports have demonstrated that the sensitivity of LPA assays may be as low as 27 to 54%. The purposes of the present study were to directly compare the abilities of four urine antigen assays to detect GBS antigen with clinical urine samples from neonates with GBS bacteremia and to evaluate the effect of the urine concentration on the sensitivities and specificities of these assays. Urine samples were collected serially from neonates with blood cultures positive for GBS or on admission from healthy full-term infants. One milliliter of urine was removed, and the remainder was concentrated to a volume of 1 ml. Unconcentrated samples were serially diluted with normal saline and were assayed to determine the highest dilution which would produce a positive test result. The Wellcogen, Bactigen, and Directigen LPA tests and ICON immunoassay were directly compared by using concentrated and unconcentrated urine specimens and urine specimens with known titers. A total of 94 urine specimens, including 61 concentrated and 75 unconcentrated specimens, from bacteremic infants were available for sensitivity testing, and 220 urine specimens from uninfected infants were available for specificity testing. There were significant differences in sensitivity among the four assays when they were performed on concentrated urine specimens, as follows: Directigen, 98%; Bactigen, 92%; ICON, 89%; Wellcogen, 68%. When the assays were performed on unconcentrated urine specimens, the Directigen (84%) and Bactigen (76%) assays were each significantly more sensitive than the ICON (59%) or Wellcogen (43%) assay. All four assays were significantly more sensitive in detecting GBS antigen in concentrated than in unconcentrated urine. The Directigen assay detected antigen in higher dilutions (geometric mean titer, 1:5) than the ICON (1:3), Bactigen (1.2), or Wellcogen (1:1) assay. The specificity was 99.5% for all four assays when concentrated urine was used and for the Bactigen, Directigen, and ICON assays when unconcentrated urine was used; the Wellcogen assay was 100% specific when unconcentrated urine was used. We conclude that there are significant differences in sensitivity but not specificity among the commercially available assays for the detection of GBS antigenuria when concentrated and unconcentrated urine specimens are tested. These differences in sensitivity may affect the abilities of clinicians to accurately diagnose GBS sepsis before culture results are available.

摘要

乳胶颗粒凝集试验(LPA)检测B族链球菌(GBS)抗原,在新生儿GBS败血症的诊断中一直发挥着作用。然而,近期报告显示,LPA检测的敏感性可能低至27%至54%。本研究的目的是直接比较四种尿液抗原检测方法检测GBS抗原的能力,使用患有GBS菌血症的新生儿的临床尿液样本,并评估尿液浓缩对这些检测方法敏感性和特异性的影响。从GBS血培养阳性的新生儿或健康足月儿入院时连续采集尿液样本。取1毫升尿液,其余尿液浓缩至1毫升。未浓缩的样本用生理盐水连续稀释,并进行检测以确定产生阳性检测结果的最高稀释度。通过使用浓缩和未浓缩的尿液标本以及已知滴度的尿液标本,直接比较Wellcogen、Bactigen和Directigen LPA检测以及ICON免疫测定。共有94份来自菌血症婴儿的尿液标本,包括61份浓缩标本和75份未浓缩标本,可用于敏感性检测,220份来自未感染婴儿的尿液标本可用于特异性检测。当对浓缩尿液标本进行检测时,四种检测方法在敏感性上存在显著差异,具体如下:Directigen为98%;Bactigen为92%;ICON为89%;Wellcogen为68%。当对未浓缩尿液标本进行检测时,Directigen检测(84%)和Bactigen检测(76%)的敏感性均显著高于ICON检测(59%)或Wellcogen检测(43%)。所有四种检测方法在检测浓缩尿液中的GBS抗原时比未浓缩尿液更敏感。Directigen检测在比ICON检测(1:3)、Bactigen检测(1:2)或Wellcogen检测(1:1)更高的稀释度(几何平均滴度为1:5)下检测到抗原。当使用浓缩尿液时,所有四种检测方法的特异性均为99.5%;当使用未浓缩尿液时,Bactigen、Directigen和ICON检测的特异性为99.5%;当使用未浓缩尿液时,Wellcogen检测的特异性为100%。我们得出结论,当检测浓缩和未浓缩尿液标本时,市售检测GBS菌尿抗原的方法在敏感性上存在显著差异,但在特异性上无显著差异。这些敏感性差异可能会影响临床医生在获得培养结果之前准确诊断GBS败血症的能力。