Heller L M, Trahiotis C
Center for Neurological Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington 06030.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Mar;97(3):1808-16. doi: 10.1121/1.413096.
Sensitivity to interaural time delays (ITDs) within high-frequency sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) target tones was measured in the presence of a second, spectrally remote diotic SAM tone (termed an interferer). Targets and interferers were 100% modulated at 250 Hz and each was presented at 77 dB SPL for a duration of 250 ms. The modulations of targets and interferers were either in-phase or out-of-phase. In the first experiment, when the target SAM tone was centered at 4 kHz, interferers were centered at either 500 Hz, 1 kHz, or 2 kHz. Threshold ITDs were substantially increased in the presence of the interferers as compared to when the targets were presented in isolation. The greatest effects were observed with interferers centered at 500 Hz and 1 kHz. In the second experiment, when the target SAM tone was centered at 2 kHz, interferers were centered at either 500 Hz or 4 kHz. Threshold ITDs increased in the presence of either interferer, but the greatest increase occurred in the presence of the 500-Hz SAM tone. In the third experiment, it was found that presenting the low-frequency SAM tones continuously resulted in less interference than did presenting the interferers and targets coincidently. In all three experiments, the effects produced by the interferers did not depend upon whether they were modulated in-phase or out-of-phase with the target. Taken together, the data argue against the notion that the interference could result from a peripheral, monaural interaction between target and interferer waveforms.
在存在第二个频谱上较远的双耳正弦幅度调制(SAM)音调(称为干扰音)的情况下,测量了对高频正弦幅度调制(SAM)目标音调中耳间时间延迟(ITD)的敏感性。目标音和干扰音在250Hz处进行100%调制,每个音以77dB SPL的强度呈现250ms。目标音和干扰音的调制要么同相要么反相。在第一个实验中,当目标SAM音调的中心频率为4kHz时,干扰音的中心频率要么为500Hz、1kHz要么为2kHz。与单独呈现目标音时相比,在存在干扰音的情况下,阈值ITD显著增加。在干扰音中心频率为500Hz和1kHz时观察到最大的影响。在第二个实验中,当目标SAM音调的中心频率为2kHz时,干扰音的中心频率要么为500Hz要么为4kHz。在存在任何一个干扰音时,阈值ITD都会增加,但在存在500Hz SAM音调时增加最大。在第三个实验中,发现持续呈现低频SAM音调所产生的干扰比同时呈现干扰音和目标音时要小。在所有三个实验中,干扰音产生的影响并不取决于它们与目标音的调制是同相还是反相。综合来看,这些数据反驳了干扰可能源于目标音和干扰音波形之间外周单耳相互作用的观点。